Skip to content

Different terminals with the same theme look different. Alacritty vs Foot #67

@mateowoetam

Description

@mateowoetam

I honestly don't know what to do here.
I've made my own custom theme inspired by catppuccin-mocha and I've tried running it in both Alacritty and Foot, and they get me different results:

my theme:

bgcol: #1E1E2E
fgcol: #C6D0F5
hicol: #B4BEFE
hicol2: #89B4FA
hicol3: #89B4FA
errcol: #F38BA8

Alacritty seems to be applying the colours correctly:
Image

but Foot does not apply the colours correctly:
Image

I've even tried different themes like gruvbox:

Alacritty:

Image

Foot:

Image

I'm in NixOS

❱ nix-shell -p nix-info --run "nix-info -m"
 - system: `"x86_64-linux"`
 - host os: `Linux 6.19.2, NixOS, 26.05 (Yarara), 26.05.20260217.0182a36`
 - multi-user?: `yes`
 - sandbox: `yes`
 - version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.31.3`
 - nixpkgs: `/nix/store/dx2qikyb4dyb6hbdfywbmsyla0z5a1h3-source`
~ ❱ alacritty --version
alacritty 0.16.1
~ ❱ foot --version
foot version: 1.25.0 +pgo +ime +graphemes -assertions
~ ❱
tt -v
tt version 0.4.2

from what i understand the issue is foot, but I've tested printing other things that use colours like fatfetch or simply runing printf and in those cases Foot handles the colours just fine like in Alacritty.

here's how they look:

Alacritty:
Image

Foot:
Image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions