Why not Input Types?

[frederikhors]

I need to understand why using the db.js example file from Readme it doesn't generate the input PostInput or input UserInput or input CommentInput.

Example:

I think it is better to use something like this:

createPost(id: ID!, input: PostInput!): Post

instead of what is now generated:

createPost(id: ID!, title: String!, views: Int!, user_id: ID!): Post.

Am I wrong? I'm still learning... I'm asking for hints. Thanks.

[mbaroukh]

I agree it would be nice to use be able to extend a common inputType for all List method parameter of entities.

[Kmaschta]

This is a good idea, and it's closer to the real usage of GraphQL nowadays.
But that will be a breaking change, so, let's keep that idea for later!

[M1chaelTran]

I did this and a little more on my fork if anyone is interested.
Feel free to take whatever you need since my changes are breaking changes and I didn't bother to update the test or documentation.
M1chaelTran@b352efe

Changes include:

• Generate of Input type for each entity
• Update now takes an id and input of entity input type
• Made all create and update input fields optional (since this is a test/mock API, it is more convenient to have everything optional)
• Remove all prefix from Queries (this it is what I need for my project, so feel free to ignore this)

[draqist]

@M1chaelTran Do you know if there's a way i can achieve this in my own project, I'm taking an assessment for a job and i'd like to be able to pass variables as inputs to the query to use them as filter methods.
Is there a way i can achieve this @slax57 ?