Some of the result best fits to the galactic spectrum look visually like they might have slightly different parameters than others reported in the literature. This could just be correct, it could be an artifact of how we are computing them (i.e., using exact analytic SNRs instead of likelihoods), or there may be some other subtlety, such as a consequence of the noise realization, instrument model, or wavelet decomposition used. Ideally, we would have some tests validating whether their is or isn't a discrepancy, and if there is, we should have some explanation for it or other internal consistency tests to validate our methodology.
Some of the result best fits to the galactic spectrum look visually like they might have slightly different parameters than others reported in the literature. This could just be correct, it could be an artifact of how we are computing them (i.e., using exact analytic SNRs instead of likelihoods), or there may be some other subtlety, such as a consequence of the noise realization, instrument model, or wavelet decomposition used. Ideally, we would have some tests validating whether their is or isn't a discrepancy, and if there is, we should have some explanation for it or other internal consistency tests to validate our methodology.