You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should have some more sanity checks after the run completes (other than just checking for normality of the residuals). Some ideas:
check the ratios of the total detectable and undetectable snrs make sense relative to the total unresolvable power
check the A and E channel snrs make sense relative to each other (e.g. total snr should be comparable, at least for observing times that are multiples of a year)
check whether A and E channel noise spectrum shapes are similar
check the evolution of the total power in the different components of the background makes sense; i.e. the faint and bright components should be either ~monotonically increasing or basically constant, and undecided power should be ~monotonically decreasing
check the evolution of the noise power in the upper and lower components appears to converge in a sensible way
check whether the final level of smoothing seems appropriate; e.g. how susceptible we are to binaries interfering with their own power
check no binaries disappear in any accounting
check T channel snr and signals are << A/E channel (if it was computed at all)
check whether the power in the fourier components of the cyclostationary model are similar between the A and E channels, even if the angles are not.
Separate from #5, although reinforcing some of the same goals.
We should have some more sanity checks after the run completes (other than just checking for normality of the residuals). Some ideas:
Separate from #5, although reinforcing some of the same goals.