Today the bot stays silent on a failed/unsupported URL in a group chat (LogMessage is inert for non-private chats) — deliberate anti-spam so the bot doesn't react to every non-video link people post.
But sometimes group error feedback is genuinely useful (e.g. a clearly-intended video link that failed). Look into providing it selectively — e.g. only reply with an error in a group when the URL was one we'd normally handle (a recognized extractor) and the failure is a real download error, not "unsupported URL".
Current silent behavior should be pinned by a test + intent comment so a review pass doesn't "fix" it into spam by accident.
Today the bot stays silent on a failed/unsupported URL in a group chat (LogMessage is inert for non-private chats) — deliberate anti-spam so the bot doesn't react to every non-video link people post.
But sometimes group error feedback is genuinely useful (e.g. a clearly-intended video link that failed). Look into providing it selectively — e.g. only reply with an error in a group when the URL was one we'd normally handle (a recognized extractor) and the failure is a real download error, not "unsupported URL".
Current silent behavior should be pinned by a test + intent comment so a review pass doesn't "fix" it into spam by accident.