Skip to content

Improvement: Add more type checking within Forest #5

@jonathan-dilorenzo

Description

@jonathan-dilorenzo

Mostly, we need clearer errors for issues arising in the Forest language, since right now it's either a syntax error of some sort (which isn't too bad) if you get the language wrong, or some type error from the generated code, that is incomprehensible unless you have fairly in depth knowledge about how the code is generated.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions