Skip to content

Technical Report Feedback #58

@matthew-ia

Description

@matthew-ia

Feedback

by Matthew Alicea

Overall pretty good, just some grammatical issues and maybe some sentences to reword. Use of figures and tables is good!


Intro / Problem, Objective, Users

  • Some grammatical errors, might be a few missing words

Design, Development, Test / Design

  • Might be a good idea to use the code style for all filenames in the text. Completely optional, but I like doing that for all file & directory names, and typically for code references like class names. You do this relatively consistently in the Logic Flow explanation with files.
  • The Logic Flow figure is very nice! Definitely going to do something like this for my report too.
  • I wonder if Chris is looking for as detailed of a "this-then-that" description of the logic flow. I would ask, and if he doesn't want it as detailed I think talking about it in more of a summary form (higher-level) would be easier to read.

Design, Development, Test / Development

  • Second sentence starts kinda wonky, maybe change to: "This was largely due to the fact that I did not have a solid project idea…" or something like that.

  • Might help to elaborate on the issues you faced with the MEAN stack approach; you mentioned it was a pain and you could not figure it out but didn't mention specifically what about it was difficult.

Results / Findings

  • I think overall just make sure you're balancing describing the charts enough but not too much, and summarizing what they mean.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions