Skip to content

Commit 651a280

Browse files
committed
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:project-ida/notes
2 parents 831da46 + f7bbe2e commit 651a280

2 files changed

Lines changed: 341 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

latex/Pion Dressing and Magnetic Transitions.tex

Lines changed: 341 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1435,6 +1435,347 @@ \subsubsection{9.8 Symmetric limit for identical
14351435
symmetric identical-system limit, that is precisely the condition for
14361436
destructive interference between the \(bb\) and \(dd\) virtual pathways.
14371437
1438+
\subsubsection{9.9 Solving for the actual low-energy
1439+
roots}\label{solving-for-the-actual-low-energy-roots}
1440+
1441+
We now keep the symmetric identical-system assumptions of Section 9.8
1442+
and go one step further: instead of treating \(E\) as a common external
1443+
parameter, we solve the Bloch-Horowitz self-consistency equations for
1444+
the actual low-energy roots.
1445+
1446+
For this subsection, take
1447+
1448+
\[
1449+
E_0=0,
1450+
\qquad
1451+
E_\chi=E_0=0,
1452+
\label{eq:E0andEchiZero}
1453+
\]
1454+
1455+
and define
1456+
1457+
\[
1458+
E_\pi \equiv \omega_\pi.
1459+
\label{eq:EpiDef}
1460+
\]
1461+
1462+
Then Eq. \(\ref{eq:commonDeltaEdef}\) reduces to
1463+
1464+
\[
1465+
\Delta(E)=E_\pi-E.
1466+
\label{eq:DeltaSimple}
1467+
\]
1468+
1469+
It is also convenient to absorb the symmetric coupling into
1470+
1471+
\[
1472+
\Omega^2 \equiv 2W^2.
1473+
\label{eq:OmegaDefLast}
1474+
\]
1475+
1476+
With this notation, the diagonal entries of Eq.
1477+
\(\ref{eq:HABdiagIdentical}\) become
1478+
1479+
\[
1480+
\lambda_{bb}(E)=-\frac{2\Omega^2}{E_\pi-E},
1481+
\label{eq:lambdabbSimple}
1482+
\]
1483+
1484+
\[
1485+
\lambda_{bd}(E)=\lambda_{db}(E)=-\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi-E},
1486+
\label{eq:lambdabdSimple}
1487+
\]
1488+
1489+
\[
1490+
\lambda_{dd}(E)=0.
1491+
\label{eq:lambdaddSimple}
1492+
\]
1493+
1494+
The physical dressed energies are found from the self-consistency
1495+
conditions
1496+
1497+
\[
1498+
E_{bb}=\lambda_{bb}(E_{bb}),
1499+
\qquad
1500+
E_{bd}=E_{db}=\lambda_{bd}(E_{bd}),
1501+
\qquad
1502+
E_{dd}=0.
1503+
\label{eq:selfConsLast}
1504+
\]
1505+
1506+
\paragraph{Exact quadratic equations}\label{exact-quadratic-equations}
1507+
1508+
For the singly-bright states \(bd\) and \(db\),
1509+
1510+
\[
1511+
E_{bd}=-\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi-E_{bd}},
1512+
\label{eq:EbdImplicit}
1513+
\]
1514+
1515+
so
1516+
1517+
\[
1518+
E_{bd}(E_\pi-E_{bd})=-\Omega^2,
1519+
\label{eq:EbdQuadraticStep}
1520+
\]
1521+
1522+
and therefore
1523+
1524+
\[
1525+
E_{bd}^2-E_\pi E_{bd}-\Omega^2=0.
1526+
\label{eq:EbdQuadratic}
1527+
\]
1528+
1529+
Thus
1530+
1531+
\[
1532+
E_{bd}^{(\pm)}=E_{db}^{(\pm)}=\frac{E_\pi\pm\sqrt{E_\pi^2+4\Omega^2}}{2}.
1533+
\label{eq:EbdRoots}
1534+
\]
1535+
1536+
For the doubly-bright state \(bb\),
1537+
1538+
\[
1539+
E_{bb}=-\frac{2\Omega^2}{E_\pi-E_{bb}},
1540+
\label{eq:EbbImplicit}
1541+
\]
1542+
1543+
so
1544+
1545+
\[
1546+
E_{bb}(E_\pi-E_{bb})=-2\Omega^2,
1547+
\label{eq:EbbQuadraticStep}
1548+
\]
1549+
1550+
and hence
1551+
1552+
\[
1553+
E_{bb}^2-E_\pi E_{bb}-2\Omega^2=0.
1554+
\label{eq:EbbQuadratic}
1555+
\]
1556+
1557+
Therefore
1558+
1559+
\[
1560+
E_{bb}^{(\pm)}=\frac{E_\pi\pm\sqrt{E_\pi^2+8\Omega^2}}{2}.
1561+
\label{eq:EbbRoots}
1562+
\]
1563+
1564+
Finally,
1565+
1566+
\[
1567+
E_{dd}=0.
1568+
\label{eq:EddExactLast}
1569+
\]
1570+
1571+
The plus roots in Eqs. \(\ref{eq:EbdRoots}\) and \(\ref{eq:EbbRoots}\)
1572+
sit near the pion scale and are not the low-energy branches we want. The
1573+
relevant low-energy solutions are therefore
1574+
1575+
\[
1576+
E_{bd}^{\rm low}=E_{db}^{\rm low}=\frac{E_\pi-\sqrt{E_\pi^2+4\Omega^2}}{2},
1577+
\label{eq:EbdLow}
1578+
\]
1579+
1580+
\[
1581+
E_{bb}^{\rm low}=\frac{E_\pi-\sqrt{E_\pi^2+8\Omega^2}}{2},
1582+
\label{eq:EbbLow}
1583+
\]
1584+
1585+
\[
1586+
E_{dd}=0.
1587+
\label{eq:EddLow}
1588+
\]
1589+
1590+
\paragraph{Small-parameter expansion}\label{small-parameter-expansion}
1591+
1592+
Define the small parameter
1593+
1594+
\[
1595+
x\equiv \frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi^2}\ll 1.
1596+
\label{eq:xSmall}
1597+
\]
1598+
1599+
Using
1600+
1601+
\[
1602+
\sqrt{1+u}=1+\frac{u}{2}-\frac{u^2}{8}+O(u^3),
1603+
\label{eq:sqrtExpand}
1604+
\]
1605+
1606+
we expand Eq. \(\ref{eq:EbdLow}\) as
1607+
1608+
\[
1609+
E_{bd}^{\rm low}
1610+
=
1611+
\frac{E_\pi-E_\pi\sqrt{1+4x}}{2}
1612+
=
1613+
-E_\pi x+E_\pi x^2+O(E_\pi x^3),
1614+
\label{eq:EbdExpandStep}
1615+
\]
1616+
1617+
so
1618+
1619+
\[
1620+
E_{bd}^{\rm low}=E_{db}^{\rm low}
1621+
=
1622+
-\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi}
1623+
+
1624+
\frac{\Omega^4}{E_\pi^3}
1625+
+
1626+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right).
1627+
\label{eq:EbdExpand}
1628+
\]
1629+
1630+
Similarly, Eq. \(\ref{eq:EbbLow}\) gives
1631+
1632+
\[
1633+
E_{bb}^{\rm low}
1634+
=
1635+
\frac{E_\pi-E_\pi\sqrt{1+8x}}{2}
1636+
=
1637+
-2E_\pi x+4E_\pi x^2+O(E_\pi x^3),
1638+
\label{eq:EbbExpandStep}
1639+
\]
1640+
1641+
so
1642+
1643+
\[
1644+
E_{bb}^{\rm low}
1645+
=
1646+
-\frac{2\Omega^2}{E_\pi}
1647+
+
1648+
\frac{4\Omega^4}{E_\pi^3}
1649+
+
1650+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right).
1651+
\label{eq:EbbExpand}
1652+
\]
1653+
1654+
And of course
1655+
1656+
\[
1657+
E_{dd}=0.
1658+
\label{eq:EddExpand}
1659+
\]
1660+
1661+
\paragraph{Energy differences}\label{energy-differences}
1662+
1663+
Now compare the singly-bright state to its neighbours above and below.
1664+
1665+
The exact spacings are
1666+
1667+
\[
1668+
E_{dd}-E_{bd}^{\rm low}
1669+
=
1670+
\frac{\sqrt{E_\pi^2+4\Omega^2}-E_\pi}{2},
1671+
\label{eq:ddMinusBdExact}
1672+
\]
1673+
1674+
and
1675+
1676+
\[
1677+
E_{bd}^{\rm low}-E_{bb}^{\rm low}
1678+
=
1679+
\frac{\sqrt{E_\pi^2+8\Omega^2}-\sqrt{E_\pi^2+4\Omega^2}}{2}.
1680+
\label{eq:bdMinusBbExact}
1681+
\]
1682+
1683+
Expanding these to the same order gives
1684+
1685+
\[
1686+
E_{dd}-E_{bd}^{\rm low}
1687+
=
1688+
\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi}
1689+
-
1690+
\frac{\Omega^4}{E_\pi^3}
1691+
+
1692+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right),
1693+
\label{eq:ddMinusBdExpand}
1694+
\]
1695+
1696+
\[
1697+
E_{bd}^{\rm low}-E_{bb}^{\rm low}
1698+
=
1699+
\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi}
1700+
-
1701+
3\frac{\Omega^4}{E_\pi^3}
1702+
+
1703+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right).
1704+
\label{eq:bdMinusBbExpand}
1705+
\]
1706+
1707+
So the two spacings are equal at leading order but differ at the next
1708+
order:
1709+
1710+
\[
1711+
\big(E_{dd}-E_{bd}^{\rm low}\big)-\big(E_{bd}^{\rm low}-E_{bb}^{\rm low}\big)
1712+
=
1713+
\frac{2\Omega^4}{E_\pi^3}
1714+
+
1715+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right).
1716+
\label{eq:asymmetryExpand}
1717+
\]
1718+
1719+
Equivalently, the midpoint shift is
1720+
1721+
\[
1722+
E_{bd}^{\rm low}-\frac{E_{bb}^{\rm low}+E_{dd}}{2}
1723+
=
1724+
-\frac{\Omega^4}{E_\pi^3}
1725+
+
1726+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right).
1727+
\label{eq:midpointShift}
1728+
\]
1729+
1730+
So the \(bd/db\) pair lies slightly \textbf{below} the exact midpoint
1731+
between \(bb\) and \(dd\) once the self-consistent \(E\)-dependence is
1732+
kept.
1733+
1734+
\paragraph{\texorpdfstring{Writing the asymmetry in terms of
1735+
\(E_{bd}\)}{Writing the asymmetry in terms of E\_\{bd\}}}\label{writing-the-asymmetry-in-terms-of-e_bd}
1736+
1737+
Introduce the leading-order singly-bright energy
1738+
1739+
\[
1740+
E_{bd}^{(0)}\equiv -\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi}.
1741+
\label{eq:Ebd0}
1742+
\]
1743+
1744+
Then
1745+
1746+
\[
1747+
\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi}\frac{E_{bd}^{(0)}}{E_\pi}
1748+
=
1749+
-\frac{\Omega^4}{E_\pi^3}.
1750+
\label{eq:Ebd0Identity}
1751+
\]
1752+
1753+
So Eq. \(\ref{eq:midpointShift}\) can be written as
1754+
1755+
\[
1756+
E_{bd}^{\rm low}-\frac{E_{bb}^{\rm low}+E_{dd}}{2}
1757+
=
1758+
\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi}\frac{E_{bd}^{(0)}}{E_\pi}
1759+
+
1760+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right)
1761+
\label{eq:midpointShiftEbd0}
1762+
\]
1763+
1764+
Likewise Eq. \(\ref{eq:asymmetryExpand}\) becomes
1765+
1766+
\[
1767+
\big(E_{dd}-E_{bd}^{\rm low}\big)-\big(E_{bd}^{\rm low}-E_{bb}^{\rm low}\big)
1768+
=
1769+
-2\,\frac{\Omega^2}{E_\pi}\frac{E_{bd}^{(0)}}{E_\pi}
1770+
+
1771+
O\!\left(\frac{\Omega^6}{E_\pi^5}\right).
1772+
\label{eq:asymmetryEbd0}
1773+
\]
1774+
1775+
To the order kept here, one may replace \(E_{bd}^{(0)}\) on the
1776+
right-hand sides by the full low-energy \(E_{bd}^{\rm low}\), because
1777+
the difference between them only feeds in at \(O(\Omega^6/E_\pi^5)\).
1778+
14381779
\printbibliography
14391780
14401781
13 KB
Binary file not shown.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)