Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.9 to 3.14.3#19

Open
rajapandi1234 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
snyk-fix-27566c829b8197b6a30904a127e50183
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.9 to 3.14.3#19
rajapandi1234 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
snyk-fix-27566c829b8197b6a30904a127e50183

Conversation

@rajapandi1234
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • databreachdetector/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:3.14.3, as this image has only 220 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
critical severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow
SNYK-DEBIAN13-IMAGEMAGICK-15044354
  786  
critical severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow
SNYK-DEBIAN13-IMAGEMAGICK-15044354
  786  
critical severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow
SNYK-DEBIAN13-IMAGEMAGICK-15044354
  786  
critical severity Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference
SNYK-DEBIAN13-IMAGEMAGICK-15044366
  786  
critical severity Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference
SNYK-DEBIAN13-IMAGEMAGICK-15044366
  786  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants