Skip to content

Improve Notification Policy UI with common matcher filters #66

Description

@Aidaho12

Summary

Notification Policies already support flexible matching through the existing matcher system, including priority and other alert/service attributes.

However, common notification-routing conditions currently require users to configure generic matchers manually.

It would be useful to expose the most commonly used conditions as simple UI filters while continuing to use the existing matcher engine internally.

Proposed filters

Initially, the Notification Policy rule editor could provide convenient selectors for:

  • Priority
  • Severity
  • Alert source
  • Service
  • Service environment
  • Service criticality
  • Service tier

For example:

Priority:       P1, P2
Severity:       Critical, Warning
Source:         Sentry
Environment:    Production
Criticality:    Critical
Tier:           Tier 1

These controls should generate the existing matcher configuration rather than introduce a separate filtering mechanism.

Advanced matchers

The current matcher editor should remain available for more advanced conditions such as:

  • Labels
  • Annotations
  • Route attributes
  • Custom matcher combinations

This could be presented as an Advanced matchers section alongside the common filters.

Why

This would make common Notification Policy configurations much easier to create and discover, while keeping all notification routing logic within the existing Notification Policy matcher system.

This also addresses the priority-based notification routing use case discussed in #64 without adding duplicate filtering logic directly to Notification Channels.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions