Skip to content

Commit 03e6ee9

Browse files
feat(api): add workflow group writes to the v2 tables surface
v2 exposed GET /groups but none of the writes, so the public API could run an enrichment or workflow column and read its binding, but never create one. A caller could add a plain data column and trigger the machine; wiring the two together still required the UI. Adds POST/PATCH/DELETE on /api/v2/tables/[tableId]/groups. The group is the unit that fills columns — one group feeds several — so creating one creates its output columns in the same call, matching the first-party shape rather than inverting it onto the column endpoint. Four departures from the first-party body, all public-surface concerns: - group.id is optional and server-generated. The UI mints an id to render optimistically; a public caller has no such need and a client-chosen id is a collision waiting to happen. - outputColumns[].workflowGroupId is dropped from the body and stamped from the resolved group, so it cannot disagree with it. - autoRun defaults to false. First-party defaults true so a UI add fills cells immediately; here it would make one POST fan out a metered run across every existing row. - A group naming neither a workflowId (type manual) nor an enrichmentId (type enrichment) is a 400 rather than a half-specified group the route has to guess about. Also rejects an outputColumns entry no group output feeds — the two arrays are joined by column name, and the first-party client builds both from one picker so it cannot desync, but a public caller can. Workspace containment on workflowId is asserted before it is persisted, on create and on any update that re-points the group; without it a table becomes a way to invoke workflows the key cannot otherwise reach.
1 parent 2366a4e commit 03e6ee9

5 files changed

Lines changed: 1337 additions & 12 deletions

File tree

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)