Improve or Remove Redundant Comments

[EmilGeorgiev]

The project is very well-documented. The structs, struct fields, methods, functions, and constants are documented thoroughly, which is crucial for the project's maintainability.

However, there are comments that don't add any additional value to the code. These comments should either be removed or improved to provide meaningful information that isn't immediately obvious. For example:

// remove the tx
if err := m.mempl.Remove(tx); err != nil {
   ...
}   

or

// decode tx
tx, err := m.txDecoder(req.Tx) {
   ...
}

In both examples, the comments are stating what the code is already clearly doing. Removing these comments would make the code cleaner. Alternatively, if there is additional context that is not immediately obvious, such as why a transaction is being removed or decoded at this point, that information should be included in the comment.

For example:

// Decode the transaction from the request.
// This step is crucial to validate and process the transaction correctly.
tx, err := m.txDecoder(req.Tx) {
   ...
}

// Attempt to remove the transaction from the mempool.
// This is necessary to ensure that invalid transactions are purged and do not get processed further.
if err := m.mempl.Remove(tx); err != nil {
  ...
}

By focusing comments on providing meaningful context rather than stating the obvious, we can help future developers understand the code better and reduce the risk of misinterpretation.