Hello,
I would like to propose adding a new optional field to the View Extension:
view:phase_angle (number): The angle between the illumination direction and the viewing direction at the scene center. Measured in degrees.
The phase angle is a fundamental geometric parameter in remote sensing and photometry, widely used in BRDF analysis, reflectance normalization, and directional effect studies.
Motivation
The phase angle is a fundamental geometric parameter in remote sensing and photometry (e.g., BRDF analysis and photometric models such as Hapke). It is frequently provided directly in mission metadata products and widely used downstream (photometric correction, multi-angular analysis, reflectance normalization, cross-sensor comparisons).
Although view:* already contains angles that can be used to derive the phase angle, in practice:
- not all catalogs provide the full set of required angles (or they vary in conventions),
- deriving phase angle reliably can be non-trivial for users,
- phase angle is often the primary parameter used by scientific processing chains and photometric models.
Making it explicit would improve interoperability and reduce ambiguity.
Proposed definition
view:phase_angle (number, degrees)
The angle measured at the target between the direction toward the light source (Sun) and the direction toward the observer (sensor), evaluated at the scene center.
Range & conventions
The phase angle is the angle between two directions (Sun→target and observer→target) measured at the target.
The schema constrains values to [0°, 180°], which is the standard geometric definition (angle between two vectors) and covers the most common use cases (Earth Observation, planetary surface imaging).
- 0° → opposition geometry (the Sun is behind the observer; the observer sees the fully illuminated side of the target),
- 180° → the target is between the observer and the Sun; the observer sees the non-illuminated (night) side of the target.
Note: Some communities use extended ranges — [0°, 360°] for integrated bodies or atmospheric observations, or signed conventions [−180°, +180°] with negative values indicating backscattering. These conventions exist but are outside the scope of this field. Providers working with such conventions are encouraged to open a discussion for possible future extensions.
Relationship to existing view:* fields
Phase angle can be derived from incidence, emission, and relative azimuth angles. A common relationship used in photometry is:
cos(ϕ) = cos(i) cos(e) + cos(a) sin(i) sin(e)
where:
- i: incidence angle
- e: emergence/emission angle
- a: relative azimuth angle
- ϕ: phase angle
However, the phase angle is more commonly used directly and is not always easy to compute consistently across varying conventions and incomplete metadata.
Example
{
"properties": {
"view:phase_angle": 42.7
}
}
If you're open to it, I can prepare a PR updating the JSON Schema and docs accordingly.
Thanks!
Hello,
I would like to propose adding a new optional field to the View Extension:
view:phase_angle(number): The angle between the illumination direction and the viewing direction at the scene center. Measured in degrees.The phase angle is a fundamental geometric parameter in remote sensing and photometry, widely used in BRDF analysis, reflectance normalization, and directional effect studies.
Motivation
The phase angle is a fundamental geometric parameter in remote sensing and photometry (e.g., BRDF analysis and photometric models such as Hapke). It is frequently provided directly in mission metadata products and widely used downstream (photometric correction, multi-angular analysis, reflectance normalization, cross-sensor comparisons).
Although
view:*already contains angles that can be used to derive the phase angle, in practice:Making it explicit would improve interoperability and reduce ambiguity.
Proposed definition
view:phase_angle(number, degrees)Range & conventions
The phase angle is the angle between two directions (Sun→target and observer→target) measured at the target.
The schema constrains values to [0°, 180°], which is the standard geometric definition (angle between two vectors) and covers the most common use cases (Earth Observation, planetary surface imaging).
Relationship to existing
view:*fieldsPhase angle can be derived from incidence, emission, and relative azimuth angles. A common relationship used in photometry is:
where:
However, the phase angle is more commonly used directly and is not always easy to compute consistently across varying conventions and incomplete metadata.
Example
{ "properties": { "view:phase_angle": 42.7 } }If you're open to it, I can prepare a PR updating the JSON Schema and docs accordingly.
Thanks!