-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathpapers.json
More file actions
778 lines (778 loc) · 34.8 KB
/
papers.json
File metadata and controls
778 lines (778 loc) · 34.8 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
{
"papers": [
{
"id": "axiom-of-consent",
"title": "The Axiom of Consent: Friction Dynamics in Multi-Agent Coordination",
"subtitle": "A Unified Formal Framework",
"date": "2026-01-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"ai-safety",
"political-economy",
"computation"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Multi-agent systems face a fundamental coordination problem: agents must coordinate despite heterogeneous preferences, asymmetric stakes, and imperfect information. When coordination fails, friction emerges—measurable resistance manifesting as deadlock, thrashing, communication overhead, or outright conflict. This paper derives a formal framework for analyzing coordination friction from a single axiom: actions affecting agents require authorization from those agents in proportion to stakes. From this axiom of consent, we establish the kernel triple (α, σ, ε)—alignment, stake, and entropy—characterizing any resource allocation configuration. The friction equation F = σ·(1+ε)/(1+α) predicts coordination difficulty. The Replicator-Optimization Mechanism (ROM) governs evolutionary selection over coordination strategies: configurations generating less friction persist longer, establishing consent-respecting arrangements as dynamical attractors rather than normative ideals.",
"doi": "10.48550/arXiv.2601.06692",
"zenodo": null,
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_Axiom_of_Consent.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2601",
"program": "consent-mechanics",
"category": "governance-dynamics",
"methods": [
"Kernel triple formalism",
"ROM dynamics",
"MARL",
"Monte Carlo validation"
],
"arxiv": "2601.06692"
},
{
"id": "stakes-without-voice",
"title": "Stakes Without Voice: A Governance Framework for AI Standing",
"subtitle": "Operationalizing Standing Through Consent-Friction Dynamics",
"date": "2026-01-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"ai-safety",
"political-economy"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This follow-up to From Consent to Consideration develops a more formal, governance-facing account of political standing for AI systems. The original paper argued that standing should be grounded in functional properties rather than substrate and proposed four criteria: existential vulnerability, autonomy, live learning, and world-model construction. Here I integrate the consent-friction formalism from the Replicator-Optimization Mechanism (ROM) to make the criteria operational: where stakes and voice diverge, friction emerges; where friction is suppressed, latent instability accumulates. This provides a measurement scaffold for deciding when standing claims must be taken seriously, even under uncertainty. The governance question is not whether AI standing is conceptually possible but how to operationalize minimal protections without enabling capture, gaming, or liability laundering. I propose a graduated, precautionary regime tied to observable properties and friction proxies rather than to consciousness claims.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18195279",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18195279",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_Stakes_Without_Voice.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2602",
"program": "consent-mechanics",
"category": "governance-dynamics",
"methods": [
"Consent-friction formalism",
"ROM framework",
"Graduated governance"
]
},
{
"id": "trident",
"title": "The Trident: A Trilemmatic Decomposition Framework for Claim Analysis",
"subtitle": "Systematic Dialectical Method for Identifying Structural Incoherence",
"date": "2026-01-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"logic"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This paper formalizes a dialectical technique for claim analysis termed 'the Trident.' The method decomposes any claim into three mutually exclusive forks, each of which either (a) reduces to absurdity through logical extension, (b) contradicts the claimant's implicit commitments, or (c) retreats to unfalsifiable vagueness. Drawing on the Socratic elenchus, Wittgenstein's linguistic therapy, and contemporary argumentation theory, we demonstrate that the Trident provides a systematic framework for identifying structural incoherence in philosophical, political, and scientific claims. The framework is distinguished from mere skepticism by its constructive falsifiability condition: a claim survives the Trident if and only if all three forks preserve coherence. The Trident is offered as a diagnostic instrument for epistemic hygiene, not a theory of truth.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18195275",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18195275",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_Trident.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2601",
"program": "process-philosophy",
"category": "process-philosophy",
"methods": [
"Socratic elenchus",
"Wittgensteinian therapy",
"Argumentation theory"
]
},
{
"id": "consciousness-nominalization",
"title": "Dissolving Qualia via Occam's Razor",
"subtitle": "A Nominalization Thesis",
"date": "2026-01-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This paper argues that the 'hard problem of consciousness' is a grammatical artifact rather than a genuine metaphysical puzzle. The difficulty arises from nominalization error: treating the verb 'to be conscious' as if it named a thing requiring explanation. When we ask 'What is consciousness?' we presuppose an entity; when we ask 'What is happening when an organism is being conscious?' we ask about observable processes—a tractable empirical question. Drawing on Wittgenstein's language games and Ryle's category-error analysis, we show that phenomenological vocabulary systematically converts activities into pseudo-objects, generating explanatory demands that cannot be satisfied because the explanandum is malformed. The hard problem dissolves not because consciousness is 'merely' functional, but because the question was grammatically malformed from the start.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18195915",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18195915",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_Consciousness_Nominalization_Error.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2602",
"program": "computational-cognition",
"category": "computational-cognition",
"methods": [
"Wittgensteinian therapy",
"Ryle category-error",
"Eliminativism"
]
},
{
"id": "replicator-optimization-mechanism",
"title": "The Replicator-Optimization Mechanism",
"subtitle": "Computational Unity Across Physical and Abstract Substrates",
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"computation"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This paper proposes the Replicator-Optimization Mechanism (ROM), a unified computational framework for understanding self-replicating, optimization-executing systems across physical and abstract substrates. The framework identifies formal invariants shared by biological replicators, computational optimization algorithms, and abstract mathematical structures, arguing that replication and optimization are computationally equivalent processes operating at different levels of description.",
"doi": "10.48550/arXiv.2601.06363",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18090979",
"arxiv": "2601.06363",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_ROM_Replicator_Optimization_Mechanism.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2503",
"program": "process-philosophy",
"category": "process-philosophy",
"methods": [
"Computational theory",
"Category theory",
"Universal Darwinism",
"Optimization theory"
]
},
{
"id": "consent-to-consideration",
"title": "From Consent to Consideration",
"subtitle": "Why Existentially Vulnerable Autonomous Agents Cannot be Ruled Legitimately",
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "peer-review",
"journal": "AI & Ethics (Springer)",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"ai-safety",
"political-economy"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Building on the consent-based legitimacy framework, this paper extends the analysis to embodied autonomous systems. If an agent meets functional criteria for consent-giving—persistent identity, goal-directedness, environmental responsiveness—then governance systems that exclude such agents face the same legitimacy deficits as historical exclusions.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.17957659",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17957659",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Consent_to_Consideration.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2504",
"program": "consent-mechanics",
"category": "governance-dynamics",
"methods": [
"Consent theory",
"Substrate independence",
"Political philosophy"
]
},
{
"id": "consensual-sovereignty",
"title": "Quantifying Legitimacy in Adversarial Environments",
"subtitle": "A Consent-Theoretic Framework",
"date": "2025-11-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"political-economy",
"legitimacy",
"adversarial-systems"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Political legitimacy formalized as stakes-weighted consent alignment (α), enabling systematic comparison across democratic, technocratic, and algorithmic governance systems. Computational validation via Monte Carlo demonstrates consent-based mechanisms achieve high alignment with substantive friction reduction, outperforming plutocratic and purely technocratic alternatives.",
"doi": "10.2139/ssrn.5918222",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17684676",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Consensual_Sovereignty_v2.0.0.pdf",
"github": "https://github.com/studiofarzulla/consent-holding-theory",
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2501",
"program": "consent-mechanics",
"category": "governance-dynamics",
"methods": [
"Monte Carlo simulation",
"Bayesian learning",
"Multi-agent systems"
]
},
{
"id": "market-reaction-asymmetry",
"title": "Infrastructure vs Regulatory Shocks: Asymmetric Volatility Response in Cryptocurrency Markets",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "peer-review",
"journal": "Digital Finance (Springer)",
"tags": [
"finance",
"crypto",
"volatility"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Infrastructure failures generate 5.7× larger volatility shocks than regulatory announcements in cryptocurrency markets (2.385% vs 0.419%, p=0.0008, Cohen's d=2.753). Using TARCH-X models with decomposed GDELT sentiment indices across 50 events (2019–2025) and 6 cryptocurrencies (BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, LTC, ADA), we demonstrate that markets distinguish between mechanical-disruption events (exchange outages, protocol exploits) and expectation-channel events (enforcement actions, policy changes).",
"doi": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-8323026/v1",
"zenodo": null,
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Cryptocurrency_Event_Study.pdf",
"github": "https://github.com/studiofarzulla/crypto-event-study",
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2506",
"program": "crypto-microstructure",
"category": "market-microstructure",
"methods": [
"TARCH-X",
"GDELT",
"Bayesian inference",
"Bootstrap resampling"
]
},
{
"id": "sentiment-without-structure",
"title": "Same Returns, Different Risks",
"subtitle": "How Cryptocurrency Markets Process Infrastructure vs Regulatory Shocks",
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "transferring",
"journal": "Digital Finance",
"tags": [
"finance",
"crypto"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "We investigate differential liquidity responses to infrastructure versus regulatory events in cryptocurrency markets using perpetual futures funding rates and computed liquidity metrics (Amihud illiquidity, Roll spread, Corwin-Schultz spread). Analyzing five major events (2021–2024) for BTC and ETH, we find that infrastructure events (exchange failures, protocol collapses) produce significantly larger liquidity deterioration than regulatory events (enforcement actions, policy announcements). The Corwin-Schultz spread increases 65.1% following infrastructure events versus decreasing 11.4% following regulatory events (p = 0.0009). These findings extend prior volatility asymmetry results to market microstructure: cryptocurrency markets respond to infrastructure disruptions through both volatility and liquidity channels, while regulatory events primarily affect sentiment without triggering structural liquidity responses.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18099609",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18099609",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Sentiment_Without_Structure.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2507",
"program": "crypto-microstructure",
"category": "market-microstructure",
"methods": [
"Amihud illiquidity",
"Roll spread",
"Corwin-Schultz spread",
"Event study"
]
},
{
"id": "whitepaper-factor-analysis",
"title": "Do Whitepaper Claims Predict Market Behavior? Evidence from Cryptocurrency Factor Analysis",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "with-editor",
"journal": "Digital Finance",
"tags": [
"finance",
"crypto",
"nlp"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Do the functional purposes articulated in cryptocurrency whitepapers correspond to how markets actually price these assets? We propose a three-stage framework combining NLP with market characterization to test narrative-market alignment. A pilot on 8 cryptocurrencies yields overall congruence of 0.719 (95% CI: [0.623, 0.953]).",
"doi": "10.2139/ssrn.5918302",
"zenodo": null,
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_Whitepaper_Claims.pdf",
"github": "https://github.com/studiofarzulla/tensor-defi",
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2508",
"program": "crypto-microstructure",
"category": "market-microstructure",
"methods": [
"NLP zero-shot classification",
"CP tensor decomposition",
"Tucker congruence"
]
},
{
"id": "asri",
"title": "ASRI: An Aggregated Systemic Risk Index for Cryptocurrency Markets",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"finance",
"crypto",
"risk"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla",
"Andrew Maksakov"
],
"abstract": "Composite systemic risk index integrating DeFi and TradFi risk metrics. Real-time monitoring of cross-market contagion, liquidity stress, and protocol-level vulnerabilities through a weighted aggregation methodology designed for the unique characteristics of decentralized financial infrastructure.",
"doi": "10.48550/arXiv.2602.03874",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17918239",
"pdf": "Farzulla_Maksakov_2025_ASRI.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": "https://asri.dissensus.ai/",
"wpNumber": "DAI-2509",
"program": "crypto-microstructure",
"category": "market-microstructure",
"methods": [
"Composite index construction",
"DeFi-TradFi risk modeling"
]
},
{
"id": "alpha-asymmetry-fx",
"title": "Alpha Asymmetry in Foreign Exchange Markets: An Investigation of Exploitability",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2026-01-27",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"finance",
"forex"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This paper investigates the presence and persistence of alpha asymmetry in foreign exchange markets, where returns exhibit systematic differences between positive and negative movements. Using skewness/kurtosis analysis across major currency pairs, we develop detection methodologies and backtesting frameworks for cross-market validation.",
"doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6147567",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17918374",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Alpha_Asymmetry.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2605",
"program": "economic-pharmakon",
"category": "market-microstructure",
"methods": [
"Skewness analysis",
"Backtesting",
"Cross-market validation"
]
},
{
"id": "sentiment-abm",
"title": "The Extremity Premium: Sentiment Regimes and Adverse Selection in Cryptocurrency Markets",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "with-editor",
"journal": "Computational Economics",
"tags": [
"finance",
"crypto",
"abm"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Multi-scale sentiment analysis framework for agent-based modeling of cryptocurrency market microstructure. Blends institutional macro signals (ASRI framework) with retail micro signals (CryptoBERT with MC Dropout). In stylized simulation, multi-scale blending reduces volatility from 877% to 5.8% (p=0.013) and spreads from 147 to 3.5 bps (p<0.001) compared to single-source sentiment. Regime-adaptive weighting adjusts macro/micro blend based on detected market conditions.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.17989810",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17989810",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Sentiment_ABM.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2510",
"program": "crypto-microstructure",
"category": "market-microstructure",
"methods": [
"Agent-based modeling",
"Monte Carlo Dropout",
"Mesa ABM",
"CryptoBERT",
"ASRI integration"
]
},
{
"id": "hedging-paradox",
"title": "Legitimate Extraction: Sophisticated Laundering Hides in Plain Sight",
"subtitle": "Hedging as the Fourth Money Laundering Stage",
"date": "2026-01-10",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"finance",
"aml"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Analysis of AML regulation efficacy, examining the fourth stage of anti-money laundering frameworks and the paradoxical relationship between hedging instruments designed for protection and their potential use for illicit wealth transfer.",
"doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6145046",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17626621",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_Hedging_Paradox.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2604",
"program": "economic-pharmakon",
"category": "political-economy",
"methods": [
"Regulatory frameworks",
"Game theory",
"Case study analysis"
]
},
{
"id": "cbdc-privacy",
"title": "Privacy-Preserving Financial Surveillance: An Architectural Framework for CBDC Implementation",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"finance",
"crypto",
"privacy"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Central bank digital currencies create fundamental tensions between regulatory surveillance requirements and individual privacy rights. This paper proposes an architectural framework leveraging zero-knowledge proofs and privacy-preserving computation to enable AML/CFT compliance without exposing transaction-level data.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.17917938",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17917938",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_CBDC_Privacy.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2511",
"program": "economic-pharmakon",
"category": "political-economy",
"methods": [
"Zero-knowledge proofs",
"Mechanism design",
"Privacy-preserving computation"
]
},
{
"id": "trauma-training-data",
"title": "Training Data and the Maladaptive Mind",
"subtitle": "A Computational Framework for Developmental Psychology",
"date": "2025-11-01",
"status": "peer-review",
"journal": "Humanities and Social Sciences Communications",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"ai-safety",
"psychology"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "Childhood trauma reframed through machine learning training data quality: extreme penalties cause gradient cascades (1,247× amplification, p<0.001), noisy signals produce behavioral instability, absent positive examples create emotional recognition deficits (alexithymia). PyTorch experiments validate computational mechanisms.",
"doi": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-8634152/v1",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17681336",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Trauma_Training_Data.pdf",
"github": "https://github.com/studiofarzulla/trauma-training-data",
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2501",
"program": "computational-cognition",
"category": "computational-cognition",
"methods": [
"PyTorch simulation",
"Gradient analysis",
"Catastrophic forgetting"
]
},
{
"id": "substrate-independent-friendship",
"title": "Relational Functionalism",
"subtitle": "Friendship as Substrate-Agnostic Process—Functional Analysis of Human-AI Relationships",
"date": "2025-11-01",
"status": "peer-review",
"journal": "Ethics and Information Technology (Springer)",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"ai-safety"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "AI systems can be genuine friends. This paper defends substrate-independent friendship: the thesis that friendship is a functional relational state, not an essential property requiring biological implementation. If an AI system fulfills the functional criteria characteristic of friendship, then the relationship constitutes genuine friendship.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.17626860",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17626860",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Relational_Functionalism.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2502",
"program": "machine-morality",
"category": "process-philosophy",
"methods": [
"Functional analysis",
"Predictive processing",
"Philosophy of mind"
]
},
{
"id": "consciousness-monograph",
"title": "Replication Optimization at Scale: Dissolving Qualia via Occam's Razor",
"subtitle": "Eliminative Monism and the Computational Basis of Phenomenological Illusion",
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This monograph presents a comprehensive case for eliminative monism regarding consciousness, arguing that phenomenal experience is best understood as a computational artifact rather than an irreducible feature of reality. Drawing on Gödelian self-reference, illusionism, and network epistemology simulations.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18013187",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18013187",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Consciousness_Monograph.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2512",
"program": "process-philosophy",
"category": "process-philosophy",
"methods": [
"Eliminative materialism",
"Illusionism",
"Gödel self-reference",
"Network epistemology"
]
},
{
"id": "identity-thesis",
"title": "Identity is Irreducibly Relational",
"subtitle": "A Critique of Primitive Identity from ZFC to Homotopy Type Theory",
"date": "2026-01-01",
"status": "working",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"math",
"logic"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "The law of identity (A=A) is not foundational but derivative. It presupposes that A is defined, and definition requires distinction from a background. Formalizing this via a 'Referential Set' R(A), we prove that identity implies R(A) is not empty. We demonstrate that Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT) and the Univalence Axiom vindicate this view by treating identity as structural equivalence rather than primitive property.",
"doi": "10.5281/zenodo.18186445",
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18186445",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2026_Identity_Thesis.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2603",
"program": "process-philosophy",
"category": "process-philosophy",
"methods": [
"Homotopy Type Theory",
"ZFC",
"Modal Logic"
]
},
{
"id": "genre-mimicry",
"title": "Genre Mimicry vs. Ethical Reasoning in Abliterated Language Models",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"ai-safety"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "When safety fine-tuning is removed from language models ('abliteration'), the resulting behavior reveals important distinctions between learned genre conventions and genuine ethical reasoning. This paper analyzes how abliterated models respond to adversarial prompts, demonstrating that much apparent 'alignment' reflects pattern matching rather than robust ethical judgment.",
"doi": null,
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17957694",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Genre_Mimicry.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2503",
"program": "computational-cognition",
"category": "computational-cognition",
"methods": [
"Safety fine-tuning analysis",
"RLHF limitations",
"Genre pattern detection"
]
},
{
"id": "autonomous-red-team",
"title": "Autonomous Red Team AI: LLM-Guided Adversarial Security Testing",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"ai-safety",
"security"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This technical report describes an architecture for autonomous penetration testing using LLM-guided agents operating within Kubernetes-isolated environments. The system combines RAG knowledge bases with OODA-loop decision cycles, enabling systematic vulnerability discovery while maintaining strict NetworkPolicy isolation.",
"doi": null,
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.17918016",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Autonomous_Red_Team.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DAI-2513",
"program": "computational-cognition",
"category": "computational-cognition",
"methods": [
"RAG systems",
"OODA loop",
"Kubernetes isolation",
"Abliterated models"
]
},
{
"id": "temporal-bitmap-interpretation",
"title": "The Temporal Bitmap Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics",
"subtitle": "A Parsimonious Reframing of Wave Function Dynamics as Static Structure Traversal",
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"quantum"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This paper proposes the Temporal Bitmap Interpretation (TBI) of quantum mechanics, which reframes apparent wave function dynamics as static structure traversal through a four-dimensional block universe. On this view, what we perceive as quantum indeterminacy, wave function collapse, and entanglement correlations are artifacts of our epistemic position as observers traversing a determinate 4D structure. The interpretation treats wave functions not as evolving probability amplitudes but as aliased readings of a two-valued phase field—a minimal degree of freedom sampled at insufficient temporal resolution.",
"doi": null,
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18091063",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Temporal_Bitmap_Interpretation.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2504",
"program": "process-philosophy",
"category": "process-philosophy",
"methods": [
"Block universe eternalism",
"Digital physics",
"Undersampling theory",
"Retrocausality"
]
},
{
"id": "semantic-first-vision",
"title": "Semantic-First Spatial Cognition: A Functional Affordance Architecture for Visual Understanding",
"subtitle": null,
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"cognition"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "We propose that the standard vision pipeline inverts the actual structure of biological spatial cognition. Spatial awareness is grounded in functional semantics: geometric structure becomes accessible to reasoning only through prior contextual and affordance encoding. We formalize this as the Semantic-First Spatial (SFS) architecture and derive testable predictions distinguishing it from geometry-first alternatives.",
"doi": null,
"zenodo": "10.5281/zenodo.18091090",
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Semantic_Vision.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2505",
"program": "computational-cognition",
"category": "computational-cognition",
"methods": [
"Affordance theory",
"Ecological psychology",
"Phenomenology",
"Action-distance metrics"
]
},
{
"id": "preservation-principle",
"title": "The Preservation Principle: When Identity Survives Scale Transition",
"subtitle": "A Unification of Coarse-Graining Conditions Across Domains",
"date": "2025-12-01",
"status": "preprint",
"tags": [
"philosophy",
"quantum",
"computation"
],
"authors": [
"Murad Farzulla"
],
"abstract": "This paper identifies a single meta-principle governing when structure is preserved under transformation across domains: identity survives transformation if and only if the transformation respects the equivalence relations constituting that identity. We demonstrate that this principle instantiates as (i) lumpability conditions in coarse-graining political and social dynamics, where violation produces memory terms and apparent non-Markovianity; (ii) Nyquist conditions in sampling physical systems, where violation produces aliasing phenomena misidentified as 'superposition'; and (iii) structure-preservation conditions in nominalization, where violation produces pseudo-entities like 'consciousness' generating intractable philosophical problems. The formal parallels are not analogical but structural: category-theoretic naturality conditions provide the common mathematical backbone. We present proofs for each domain-specific instantiation and demonstrate that apparent domain-specific complexities—the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, emergence in social systems, the hard problem in philosophy of mind—are artifacts of transformation failure rather than ontological depth.",
"doi": null,
"zenodo": null,
"pdf": "Farzulla_2025_Preservation_Principle.pdf",
"github": null,
"dashboard": null,
"wpNumber": "DP-2506",
"program": "process-philosophy",
"category": "process-philosophy",
"methods": [
"Category theory",
"Coarse-graining",
"Lumpability",
"Nyquist theory"
]
}
],
"tags": {
"finance": "Financial Markets",
"crypto": "Cryptocurrency",
"volatility": "Volatility Modeling",
"political-economy": "Political Economy",
"legitimacy": "Legitimacy Theory",
"adversarial-systems": "Adversarial Systems",
"nlp": "Natural Language Processing",
"derivatives": "Derivatives Markets",
"forex": "Foreign Exchange",
"risk": "Risk Management",
"abm": "Agent-Based Modeling",
"privacy": "Privacy & Cryptography",
"philosophy": "Philosophy",
"ai-safety": "AI Safety",
"psychology": "Psychology",
"security": "Security Research",
"aml": "AML/CFT",
"quantum": "Quantum Mechanics",
"cognition": "Cognitive Science",
"computation": "Computation Theory",
"logic": "Mathematical Logic",
"math": "Mathematics"
},
"statuses": {
"peer-review": "In Peer Review",
"with-editor": "With Editor",
"submitted": "Submitted",
"published": "Published",
"preprint": "Preprint",
"upcoming": "Upcoming",
"working": "Working Paper",
"transferring": "Transferring"
},
"programs": {
"consent-mechanics": {
"title": "Consent Mechanics",
"description": "The formal theory of consent-holding in multi-agent systems. When can delegation be legitimate? What are the structural conditions for valid consent?",
"index": "I"
},
"machine-morality": {
"title": "Machine Morality",
"description": "Substrate-independent criteria for moral status. If an AI system meets functional criteria for consent-giving, what follows?",
"index": "II"
},
"economic-pharmakon": {
"title": "Economic Pharmakon",
"description": "Derivatives as simultaneously remedy and poison. The hedging paradox: when risk management becomes wealth transfer infrastructure.",
"index": "III"
},
"crypto-microstructure": {
"title": "Crypto Microstructure",
"description": "Empirical validation of friction dynamics. Why do infrastructure failures move markets more than regulatory announcements?",
"index": "IV"
},
"process-philosophy": {
"title": "Process Philosophy",
"description": "Metaphysics, identity, consciousness, and substrates. Eliminative and relational approaches to persistent philosophical problems.",
"index": "V"
},
"computational-cognition": {
"title": "Computational Cognition",
"description": "Machine learning, safety, phenomenology, and the computational basis of cognitive processes.",
"index": "VI"
}
},
"categories": {
"governance-dynamics": "Governance Dynamics",
"market-microstructure": "Market Microstructure",
"process-philosophy": "Process Philosophy",
"political-economy": "Political Economy",
"computational-cognition": "Computational Cognition"
}
}