The current spring layout treats all edges equally for positioning, causing single-event co-participants to cluster together. This visual proximity invites misinterpretation as social closeness.
Problem:
- Spatial proximity in network visualizations is naturally read as relational proximity
- Single co-attendance at a large event should not visually cluster people together
- The current visualization does not distinguish repeated from incidental co-participation
Proposed solution:
Adjust layout and styling to reflect a meaningful data distinction:
- Layout: Transform edge weights so single co-attendance (weight = 1) exerts minimal pull; repeated co-participation (weight ≥ 2) positions nodes closer
- Edge styling: Single co-attendance as faint dashed lines; repeated co-participation as solid lines with width scaled to weight
Framing (important):
- This is not a claim that repeated co-participation equals genuine relationship
- This is a visual encoding that reflects a meaningful distinction in the data
- Dashed lines signal "interpret with caution," not "unimportant"
To do:
Reference: See md file for implementation.
The current spring layout treats all edges equally for positioning, causing single-event co-participants to cluster together. This visual proximity invites misinterpretation as social closeness.
Problem:
Proposed solution:
Adjust layout and styling to reflect a meaningful data distinction:
Framing (important):
To do:
Reference: See md file for implementation.