There is an error in the definition of noa, it should be Not..., or... NOT Not... and or.... It COULD be Not...and/or... which is probably what was intended, but I think Not..., or... is better stylistically. Really the definition should be rewritten, but it is probably inoca that should get the rewrite.
error in inoca too similar: correct not … and or, to Not..., or...
The definition of inoca needs a thoughtful rewrite, and noa should refer to it. noca might need the same correction.
There is an error in the definition of noa, it should be Not..., or... NOT Not... and or.... It COULD be Not...and/or... which is probably what was intended, but I think Not..., or... is better stylistically. Really the definition should be rewritten, but it is probably inoca that should get the rewrite.
error in inoca too similar: correct not … and or, to Not..., or...
The definition of inoca needs a thoughtful rewrite, and noa should refer to it. noca might need the same correction.