Enable setting up integration via ConfigFlow UI

[dala318]

Although the configuration.yaml setup works using the UI to setup the integration in much more user-friendly.
(It also is an enabler to group entities to devices, https://developers.home-assistant.io/docs/device_registry_index/#automatic-registration-through-an-entity)

• add config_flow.py and modify manifest.json
  Add ConfigFlow and DeviceInfo #174
• fuse the config flow result into same format as configuration.yaml
• add async_setup_entry() to main and all platforms
• ensure entities are correctly created
• add UI section to rename Containers (added but later removed)
• tidy up and make ready for review and merge
• investigate why sometimes some containers return None from container.get_info() for device registry (container info no loger used at device registry)
• add a re-configuration dialog to change settings after finalization
  Add Reconfigure flow #178
• add a re-authorization dialog if connection to docker is lost
  Add Re-Authorization configuration step #179
  Fix Re-Authorization #183 (fix)
• investigate if it makes sense to add the async_step_import()method that will convert configuration.yaml into config_entry.
  Add import from configuration.yaml #181
• add template function for managing entry version migration
  Add base for managing config_entry version migration #182
• investigate and fix why removed entities at reconfigure stays as unavailable until restart of Home Assistant

[dala318]

If you want to I could attempt to fix this on my fork of the repo

[ualex73]

if you want to take a stab at it, please do ... but the biggest problem with the current yaml, there are a LOT of possible configuration options ;-)

[dala318]

Yes, I have noticed so :-)
I think it will be a three step setup-process (1: connect to host, 2: select containers, 3: select options)
But want to re-use as much as possible from the original set-up process so have to convert the result back so it look identical as if it was originating from the configuration.yaml

[ualex73]

I am briefly testing it (do not have extremely a lot of time), the following things we need to investigate/do more:

1. The naming of existing YAML entries are a bit messy (cannot recognize them now ;-)). Prefix does not seem to be used?
2. Reconfigure is required, because just too many things to configure
3. Seems I cannot re-add a docker entry, after I deleted it?

But I am happy with the current work, you have done a lot ! Thanks!

[ualex73]

Tomorrow I will make some changes for entity_id and name of the sensors/switches to get it a bit aligned. Also, we need to think if certain options can be removed in the UI config (which were handy/needed in YAML). Enough things to think about ;-)

[ualex73]

Friendly name, entity id and unique id is "not" fun ... HA links friendly name and entity id, so the renaming/aliasses/etc configuration in the YAML/UI is not useable anymore.
I refactored this a bit in the sensor.py/switch.py in the new branch.

Cleaned up also the config flow with items which should not be in the UI.

I will refactor the init/run a bit more, because "certain" code starts running in the background during the config_flow run ... Which should not ;-)

[dala318]

Good feedback, I'll rebase my local repo with your config_flow branch and continue to work on the reconfigure steps.

[ualex73]

Thanks :-) I am also working on improving the load/unload of the DockerAPI/DockerContainerAPI (and cancelling all tasks and making the entities unavailable ;-)) Op ma 20 jan 2025 om 11:42 schreef DanielV ***@***.***>:

…

Good feedback, I'll rebase my local repo with your config_flow branch and continue to work on the reconfigure steps. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#173 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQASXDA33KOOCM4VU5HTPT2LTHIHAVCNFSM6AAAAABVFIAMECVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMBSGA3DCMZWGM> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[dala318]

During your clean-up of config_flow.py a self.data.update(user_input) was removed from async_step_containers() which makes the selection of containers not being stored ;-)

[ualex73]

Aha :-) my mistake, if you can add it to your pull then it is re-added Op ma 20 jan 2025 om 12:54 schreef DanielV ***@***.***>

…

During your clean-up of config_flow.py a self.data.update(user_input) was removed from async_step_containers() which makes the selection of containers not being stored ;-) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#173 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQASXDVZZ3HYENRTYRG5QD2LTPYBAVCNFSM6AAAAABVFIAMECVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMBSGIZDIMZYGE> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[dala318]

Aha :-) my mistake, if you can add it to your pull then it is re-added

Yes, part of #178