Need
It is an advanced features but it would be useful sometimes to allow filtering and sorting certain long tables (such as Blocks, Asset details, Contract details, etc.).
Proposal
Add discreet options in the headers of long tables to filter them (i.e. hide rows which do not contain the text entered by the user in a text field below the header, which is hidden by default) and/or sort them (in both direction or back in their original order, as seen in Wikipedia tables by instance).
The sorting can of course only be applied to one column, but the filtering can be the combination of filters on multiple columns.
Remark: To avoid inconsistent behaviors when combining both filtering and sorting, the sorting shall always be internally computed on ALL the rows, even the hidden ones.
Idea: To keep the GUI clean and simple, the above filtering and sorting options can be discreet (e.g. only visible when hovering, or when active) and could even only be made available for tables of more than 10 rows.
Need
It is an advanced features but it would be useful sometimes to allow filtering and sorting certain long tables (such as
Blocks,Asset details,Contract details, etc.).Proposal
Add discreet options in the headers of long tables to filter them (i.e. hide rows which do not contain the text entered by the user in a text field below the header, which is hidden by default) and/or sort them (in both direction or back in their original order, as seen in Wikipedia tables by instance).
The sorting can of course only be applied to one column, but the filtering can be the combination of filters on multiple columns.
Remark: To avoid inconsistent behaviors when combining both filtering and sorting, the sorting shall always be internally computed on ALL the rows, even the hidden ones.
Idea: To keep the GUI clean and simple, the above filtering and sorting options can be discreet (e.g. only visible when hovering, or when active) and could even only be made available for tables of more than 10 rows.