-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathMath147notes.tex
More file actions
245 lines (193 loc) · 12.9 KB
/
Math147notes.tex
File metadata and controls
245 lines (193 loc) · 12.9 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\textwidth 15cm
\textheight 21.3cm
\evensidemargin 6mm
\oddsidemargin 6mm
\topmargin -1.1cm
\setlength{\parskip}{1.5ex}
\usepackage[sumlimits,nointlimits,namelimits]{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage[dvips]{color}
\newcommand{\N}{{\mathbb N}}
\newcommand{\R}{{\mathbb R}}
\newtheorem {prop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem {conj}{Conjecture}
\newtheorem {cor}{Corollary}
\newtheorem {thm}{Theorem}
\newtheorem {lem}{Lemma}
\newtheorem {ex}{Example}
\newtheorem {fact}{Fact}
\title{Math147 Notes - Kathryn Hare}
\author{Wen Hui Zhang}
\begin{document}
\pagenumbering{gobble}
\maketitle
\newpage
\pagenumbering{arabic}
\section{Real Numbers}
\subsection{Completeness Axiom of Real Numbers}
Every non-empty subset of the real numbers that is bounded above has a least upper bound.
(Similarly every non-empty subset of reals bounded below has a least upper bound)
\subsection{Characterization of the Least Upper Bound (Greatest Lower Bound)}
A is an upper bound if:
\begin{enumerate}
\item A is an upper bound
\item For all $z \in \R$, if $z < A$, then
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Archimedean Property}
Given any real number $x$, there is some $N \in \N$ such that $N > x$
\subsection{Squeeze Theorem}
\begin{thm}
Suppose $(x_n) \leq (y_n) \leq (z_n)$ for all $n \in \N^*$. Assume $(x_n) \longrightarrow L$ and
$(z_n) \longrightarrow L$. Then $(y_n) \longrightarrow L$.
\newline
\newline
For functions: If $f(x) \leq g(x) \leq h(x)$ for all $x$ "near" $a$, and if $lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L = lim_{x \to a} h(x)$,
then also $lim_{x \to a} g(x) = L$.
\end{thm}
\subsection{Bounded Sequences}
Say $(x_n)$ is bounded if there is some $C$ with $|x_n| \leq C$ for all $n \in \N$.
\subsection{Monotonic Convergence Theorem (MCT)}
\begin{thm}
If $(x_n)$ is a monotonic sequence that is bounded, then $(x_n)$ converges.
\end{thm}
\paragraph{Proof of MCT}
Suppose $(x_n)$ is increasing and bounded above. Let $A = \{x_n : n = 1 , 2 , 3 . . . \}$. Note that this set is non-empty
and bounded above.\\ By the Completeness Axiom of $\R$, $A$ has a LUB, call it $L$.\\
Let $\epsilon > 0$. Since $L$ is an upper bound for $A$, $x_n \leq L$ for all $n \in \N$, hence $x_n < L + \epsilon$ (for all $n$).
Since $L$ is LUB(A), and $L - \epsilon < L$, there is some $x_N \in A$ with $x_N > L - \epsilon$. Since $(x_n)$ is increasing,
$x_n \geq x_N$ if $n \geq N$. $x_n > L - \epsilon$. Hence for all $n \geq N, L - \epsilon < x_n < L + \epsilon$ and therefore $(x_n) \longrightarrow L$.
\subsection{Nested Interval Property}
Given any collection of nested intervals $[a_1, b_1] \supseteq [a_2, b_2] \supseteq . . .$ with $(b_n - a_n) \longrightarrow 0$, there is a unique $x_n \in [a_n, b_n]$ for every $n$.
\begin{prop}
Every sequence has a monotonic subsequence.
\end{prop}
\subsection{Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem}
\begin{thm}
Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence.
\end{thm}
\paragraph{Proof of BWT}
By the previous proposition, every sequence has a monotonic subsequence. Since the original sequence is bounded,
this subsequence is also bounded, thus by MCT, it converges.
\subsection{Cauchy Sequences}
A sequence $(x_n)$ is called Cauchy if for every $\epsilon > 0$ there is some $N \in \N$ so that $|x_n - x_m| < \epsilon$
if $n, m \geq N$
\begin{enumerate}
\item Any convergent sequence is Cauchy.
\item Any cauchy sequence is bounded.
\end{enumerate}
\begin{thm}
Every Cauchy sequence converges.
\end{thm}
\paragraph{Proof.} Since the sequence $(x_n)$ is Cauchy it is bounded. By the BW theorem, it has a convergent subsequence $(x_n)^\infty_{k = 1}$ with limit L. Let $\epsilon > 0$. Since $(x_n)$ is Cauchy, there is some $N$ such that
$|x_n - x_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$ if $n, m \geq N$. Furthermore, since $(x_{n_k}) \longrightarrow L$, there is some index
$n_k > N$ where $|x_{n_k} - L| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$. Let $n \geq N$. Then $|x_n - L| \leq |x_n - x_{n_k}| + |x_{n_k} - L| \leq \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon$.
\newpage
\section{Limits of Functions}
Say $f$ has limit $L \in \R$ at point $p$ if for every $\epsilon > 0$ there is some $\delta > 0$ such that whenever $0 < |x - p| < \delta$, then $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon$.
\subsection{Continuous Functions}
For $f: A \subseteq \R \longrightarrow \R$, $f$ is continuous at $a \in A$ if $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a)$ (one-sided limit if $a$ is an endpoint of $A$)
For every $\epsilon > 0$, there is some $\delta > 0$, so that $|x - a| < \delta$ implies $|f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon$.
\subsection{Sequential Characterization}
$f: A \longrightarrow \R$ is continuous at $a \in A$ if and only if whenever $(x_n)$ is a sequence from $A$ (meaning every $(x_n) \in A$) with $(x_n) \to a$, then $(f(x_n)) \to f(a)$.
\subsection{Composition of Functions}
$f: A \longrightarrow \R g: B \longrightarrow \R, B \supseteq$ Range of $f$
\begin{thm}
If $f: A \longrightarrow \R$ is continuous at $a \in A$ and $g$ is continuous at $f(a)$, then $g \circ f(x)$ is continuous at $a$.
\end{thm}
\paragraph{Proof.}
Show if $(x_n) \to a$ $(x_n \in A)$, then $(g \circ f(x_n)) \to g \circ f(a)$.\\
Let $(x_n) \to a$, $x_n \in A$. $f$ is continuous at $a$. Thus $(f(x_n)) \to f(a)$.\\
Let $f(x_n) = y_n$. $y_n \in$ Range $f \subseteq B$. $(y_n) \to f(a)$ and $g$ is continuous at $f(a)$.
$(g(y_n)) \to g(f(a)) = g \circ f(a)$. Thus $g(f(x_n)) \to g \circ f(a)$. Therefore $g \circ f$ is continuous at $a$.
\subsection{Intermediate Value Theorem}
\begin{thm}
Suppose $f: [a, b] \to \R$ is continuous. Assume $f(a) < 0$ and $f(b) > 0$. Then there exists $c \in [a, b]$ with $f(c) = 0$.
\end{thm}
\paragraph{Proof.}
Let $A = \{x \in [a, b]: f(x) < 0\}$. $A$ is not empty as $a \in A$. Also, $A$ is bounded. By the Completeness Axiom of
$\R$, $A$ has a LUB, call it $L$. $a \leq L \leq b$ (since b is an UB for A). Hence $f$ is continuous at $L$. Notice
\subsection{Extreme Value Theorem}
\subsection{Increasing / Decreasing Function}
$f$ is (strictly) increasing if whenever $x_2 > x_1$, then $f(x_2) \geq f(x_1)$.
If $f:[a, b] \to \R$ is continuous and 1 - 1, then it is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.
\subsection{Inverse Trig Functions}
\begin{itemize}
\item $sine \to y = arcsin(x) \Leftrightarrow siny = x$ and $y = \left[ -\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}\right]$.
\item $cosine \to y = arccos(x) \Leftrightarrow cosy = x$ and $y = \left[ 0, \pi \right]$.
\item $tan \to y = arctan(x) \Leftrightarrow tany = x$ and $y = \left[ -\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}\right]$.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Logarithm Function}
\newpage
\section{Differentiation}
Say $f$ is differentiable at $a$ if $\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(a+h) - f(a)}{h}$ exists and then we denote this limit by $f'(a)$.
If $f,g$ are differentiable at $a$,
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f \pm g$ is differentiable at $a$, and $(f \pm g)'(a) = f'(a) \pm g'(a)$.
\item $f \cdot g$ is differentiable at $a$, and $(fg)'(a) = f'(a)g(a) + g'(a)f'(a)$.
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Chain Rule}
$f: A \to B \subseteq \R$, $g: B \to \R$
If $f$ is differentiable at $a$, and $g$ is differentiable at $f(a)$ then $g \circ f$ is differentiable at $a$ and $(g \circ f)'(a) = g'(f(a)) \cdot f'(a)$.
\subsection{Caratheodory Theorem}
\begin{thm}
If $F$ is differentiable at $a$, then there is a function $\Phi$ which is continuous at $a$ and $F(x) - F(a) = \Phi(x)(x - a)$
for all $x$, and $\Phi(a) = F'(a)$.
\end{thm}
\subsection{Derivatives of Inverses}
Let $f: (c, d) -> \R$ be a continuous, $1 - 1$ function on $(c, d)$. Suppose $f$ is differentiable at $a \in (c, d)$ and $f'(a) \neq 0$. Then $f^{-1}$ is differentiable at $f(a)$ and $(f^{-1})'(f(a)) = \frac{1}{f'(a)}$.
$($ or, write $b = f(a) \leftrightarrow f^{-1}(b) = a$ and see $(f^{-1})'(b) = \frac{1}{f'(f^{-1}(b))}$.
\subsection{Implicit Differentiation}
A point $x$ is a local maximum for $f$ if there is some $\delta > 0$ such that if $y \in (x - \delta, x + \delta)$ and $y \in$ Domain $f$, $f(y) \leq f(x)$. $x$ is a (global) maximum if $f(y) \leq f(x)$ for all $y \in$ Domain $f$.
\subsection{Critical Points Theorem (CPT)}
\begin{thm}
If $f$ has a local max or min at $x \in (a, b) \subseteq$ Domain of $f$ and if $f$ is differentiable at $x$, then $f'(x) = 0$.
\end{thm}
\paragraph{Proof.}
$f$ is differentiable at $x$ so $\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h}$ exists.\\
Get $\delta > 0$ from definition of local min/max if $z \in (x - \delta, x + \delta)$ then $f(x) \geq f(z)$. If $|h| < \delta$, then $x + h \epsilon (x - \delta, x + \delta)$.\\
Therefore, $f(x+h) - f(x) \leq 0$. If $0 < h < \delta$, then $\frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h} \leq 0$, so $\lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h} \geq 0$. If $-\delta < h < 0$, then $\lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h} \geq 0 \Rightarrow$ since limit exists, $\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h} = 0$, so $f'(x) = 0$.
\subsection{Mean Value Theorem}
If $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and differentiable on $(a, b)$ then there is a $c \in (a, b)$ such that $f'(c) = \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b - a}$.
\subsection{Rolle's Theorem}
If $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and differentiable on $(a, b)$ and $f(a) = f(b)$, then there is a $c \in (a, b)$ such that $f'(c) = 0$
\paragraph{Proof.}
Since $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ it has a global maximum and minimum by EVT. If one of these occurs at some point $c \in (a, b)$, then since $f$ is differentiable there, $f'(c) = 0$ by CPT. Otherwise, the global max and min occur at $a$ and $b$, and $f(a) = f(b)$, and that implies that $f$ is constant, and so $f'(c) = 0$ for every $c \in (a, b)$.
\subsection{Increasing Function Theorem}
If $f'(x) \geq 0$ for every $x \in (a, b)$ and $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$, then $f$ is increasing on $[a, b]$.
\subsection{First Derivative Test}
Assume $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and $c \in [a, b]$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $f' \geq 0$ on $(a, c)$ and $f' \leq 0$ on $(c, b)$ then $c$ in local max.
\item If $f' \leq 0$ on $(a, c)$ and $f' \geq 0$ on $(c, b)$ then $c$ in local min.
\item If $f'$ is some sign on both sides (i.e. $> 0$ or $< 0$ on both sides) then $c$ is neither local max/min.
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Second Derivative}
Say $f$ is concave up on interval $I$ if $f'(x)$ is strictly increasing on $I$. Say $f$ is concave down on $I$ if $f'(x)$ is strictly
decreasing on $I$. Call $c$ an inflection point if $f'(c)$ exists at $c$ and the concavity of $f$ changes at $c$. $\exists \delta > 0$ such that $f$ is concave up on $(c - \delta, c)$ and down on $(c, c + \delta)$ (or vice versa).
\subsection{Second Derivative Test}
Suppose $f'(c) = 0$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $f''(c) > 0$ ($< 0$) then $f$ has a local min (max) atc.
\item If $f''(c) = 0$, then anything is possible.
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Cauchy Mean Value Theorem}
If $f, g$ are continuous on $[a, b]$ and differentiable on $(a, b)$, then there is some $c \in (a, b)$ such that
$(f(b) - f(a))g'(c) = f'(c)(g(b) - g(a))$.
\subsection{L'Hopital's Rule}
Assume $f, g$ are differentiable on interval $I = [a -\delta, a + \delta]$ except possibly at $a$. Assume $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a} g(x)$ and either $\lim_{x \to a} f = 0$ or $\infty$. Suppose $g, g'$ are non-zero at $I$, except perhaps at $a$. If $\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} = L \in \R$, then $\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = L$.
\paragraph{Proof.}
$\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = 0 = \lim_{x \to a} g(x)$. Recall $f, g$ were defined and differentiable on $I = [a - \delta_0, a + \delta_0]$ for some $\delta_0 > 0$ except possibly at $a$. (Re)define $f$ and $g$ at $a$ by setting $f(a) = g(a) = 0$. This does not change $f'$ or $g'$ at points $x \neq a$. Our new $f, g$ are still differentiable on $I$ except possibly at $a$. Since $\lim_{x \to a} f = f(a) = 0$. To see that $lim_{x \to a} \frac{f}{g} = L$, we have to take any $\epsilon > 0$ and find $\delta > 0$ such that $0 < |x - a| < \delta$, then $|\frac{f}{g}(x) - L| < \epsilon$. Know that $\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f'}{g'} = L$. Let $\epsilon > 0$. Then there exists $\delta_1 > 0$ such that $0 < |x - a| < \delta_1 \Longrightarrow |\frac{f'}{g'}(x) - L| < \epsilon$. Let $\delta = min(\delta_0, \delta_1) > 0$. Let $0 < |x - a| < \delta$.\\\\
Suppose $x > a$. We have $f, g$ continuous on $[a, x]$ and differentiable on $(a, x)$. So CMVT applies. Hence there exists a $c \in (a, x)$ such that, $(f(x) - f(a))g'(c) = f'(c)(g'(x) - g'(a))$. By assumption, $g'(c) \neq 0$ since $c \neq a$. Also, $g(x) - g(a) \neq 0$ since $g(a) = 0$ and $g(z) \neq 0$ for any $z \in I$, except $z = a$. Divide to get:\\
\begin{equation*}
\frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)} = \frac{f(x) - f(a)}{g(x) - g(a)}
\end{equation*}
\noindent Thus,\\
\begin{equation*}
|\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} - L| = |\frac{f(x) - f(a)}{g(x) - g(a)} - L| = |\frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)} - L|
\end{equation*}
\noindent for some $c \in (a, x)$. Hence $0 < |c - a| < \delta \leq delta_1$, so $|\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} - L| = |\frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)} - L| < \epsilon$.
\subsection{Taylor Polynomials}
\subsection{Taylor's Theorem}
\end{document}