🧪 test(frontend): comprehensive tests for network-consent

[Adityavanjre]

🎯 What: Testing gap addressed
The hasNetworkConsent function inside nexus/frontend/src/lib/network-consent.ts lacked tests, particularly regarding its interactions with window.sessionStorage and fallback behaviors when window is undefined.

📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested

• Validates fallback behavior returning true when window is undefined (via Node jest environment).
• Validates memory caching overrides and caching behavior.
• Verifies that false is returned when sessionStorage fails, is empty, or encounters an exception.
• Verifies that true is returned when sessionStorage contains "granted".

✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage
Coverage for hasNetworkConsent is now complete, guaranteeing robustness for the component's edge cases and fallback interactions. Overall lines and function coverage inside network-consent.ts have significantly improved.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 7997950237695755626 started by @Adityavanjre

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Adityavanjre has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Free

Run ID: 67795655-0a87-4d3d-8e7d-03a91c56dbb5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6051811 and 4849d32.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• nexus/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• nexus/frontend/jest.config.js
• nexus/frontend/jest.setup.js
• nexus/frontend/package.json
• nexus/frontend/src/lib/network-consent.node.test.ts
• nexus/frontend/src/lib/network-consent.test.ts

---

Note

🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit Free

Your organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4849d32c5f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Update the root workspace lockfile for the new Jest deps

Because /workspace/ERP/package.json declares nexus/frontend as a workspace, root-level installs use /workspace/ERP/package-lock.json, not the newly added nexus/package-lock.json. That existing root lock still has no entries for the newly added frontend test deps such as @testing-library/jest-dom, @testing-library/react, or jest-environment-jsdom, and npm ci is documented to error when package.json and the package lock disagree; CI/dev flows that run npm ci --workspace nexus/frontend from the repo root will not get a reproducible install for the new npm test script. Please update the root lockfile alongside these deps.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.