Skip to content

[balanceplatform] Code generation: update services and models#350

Open
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/balanceplatform
Open

[balanceplatform] Code generation: update services and models#350
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/balanceplatform

Conversation

@AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR contains the automated changes for the balanceplatform service.

The commit history of this PR reflects the adyen-openapi commits that have been applied.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested review from a team as code owners February 17, 2026 21:46
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request automates the update of services and models for the balanceplatform service, incorporating new API functionalities generated from the adyen-openapi specification. It ensures the client library remains synchronized with the latest API definitions.

Highlights

  • New API Endpoint: Added the get_tax_form_summary method to the AccountHoldersApi service, enabling the retrieval of tax form summaries for specific account holders.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • lib/adyen/services/balancePlatform/account_holders_api.rb
    • Added the get_tax_form_summary method to fetch tax form summaries for account holders.
Activity
  • Automated code generation process initiated by AdyenAutomationBot.
  • Updated services and models based on the latest adyen-openapi specification.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new get_tax_form_summary method to the AccountHoldersApi, which appears to be an automated, generated change. The implementation is consistent with other methods in the file. My review includes a couple of suggestions to enhance code quality by addressing code duplication in endpoint construction and refining how query strings are generated. These improvements could be beneficial if applied more broadly, perhaps even to the code generator itself.

Comment on lines +67 to +69
endpoint = '/accountHolders/{id}/taxFormSummary'.gsub(/{.+?}/, '%s')
endpoint = endpoint.gsub(%r{^/}, '')
endpoint = format(endpoint, id)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This pattern for building the endpoint URL is duplicated across several methods in this class (e.g., get_account_holder, get_tax_form). To improve maintainability and reduce redundancy, consider extracting this logic into a private helper method.

For example:

private

def build_endpoint(path, *params)
  endpoint = path.gsub(/{.+?}/, '%s').delete_prefix('/')
  format(endpoint, *params)
end

This would allow you to simplify the implementation in this and other methods:

def get_tax_form_summary(id, headers: {}, query_params: {})
  endpoint = build_endpoint('/accountHolders/{id}/taxFormSummary', id)
  # ...
end

endpoint = '/accountHolders/{id}/taxFormSummary'.gsub(/{.+?}/, '%s')
endpoint = endpoint.gsub(%r{^/}, '')
endpoint = format(endpoint, id)
endpoint += create_query_string(query_params)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The create_query_string method appends a ? to the URL even when query_params is empty. While this is generally not a functional issue, it results in URLs with a trailing ? when no query parameters are provided. It would be cleaner to modify create_query_string to only append the query string when parameters are present.

Suggested change in lib/adyen/services/service.rb:

def create_query_string(params)
  return '' if params.empty?
  "?#{URI.encode_www_form(params)}"
end

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/balanceplatform branch from 09c38c6 to 27bd9fb Compare February 18, 2026 14:47
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/balanceplatform branch from 27bd9fb to a5ce7ad Compare March 10, 2026 08:55
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant