Skip to content

Conversation

@noamteyssier
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @noamteyssier, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and consistency of the codebase's naming conventions, particularly within the bq and vbq modules. By standardizing header and writer struct names to FileHeader and Writer, the changes aim to improve readability and reduce potential confusion. Additionally, new utility methods have been introduced to streamline the process of creating writer builders from pre-existing header configurations, simplifying API usage for developers.

Highlights

  • Namespace Refinement for BQ Module: The BinseqHeader and BinseqHeaderBuilder structs within the bq module have been renamed to FileHeader and FileHeaderBuilder respectively. Similarly, BinseqWriter and BinseqWriterBuilder are now Writer and WriterBuilder.
  • Namespace Refinement for VBQ Module: The VBinseqHeader and VBinseqHeaderBuilder structs within the vbq module have been renamed to FileHeader and FileHeaderBuilder respectively. The VBinseqWriter and VBinseqWriterBuilder are now Writer and WriterBuilder.
  • Documentation Updates: Extensive updates have been made across the codebase, including examples and module-level documentation, to reflect the new naming conventions and clarify references to 'BQ' and 'VBQ' file formats.
  • New Builder Initialization Methods: The BinseqWriterBuilder now includes convenience methods (from_bq_header, from_vbq_header, from_cbq_header) to initialize a builder instance directly from existing BQ, VBQ, or CBQ header configurations.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@noamteyssier noamteyssier merged commit 8564733 into binseq-0.9.0 Jan 23, 2026
28 checks passed
@noamteyssier noamteyssier deleted the improve-namespace-of-codebase branch January 23, 2026 23:21
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a significant and well-executed refactoring to improve naming conventions across the codebase. Key structs like BinseqHeader and BinseqWriter have been renamed to the more generic FileHeader and Writer respectively, within both the bq and vbq modules. These changes are consistently applied throughout the code, including documentation and examples, enhancing clarity and maintainability. The addition of from_*_header constructors in src/write.rs is a nice touch for improving interoperability between formats. Overall, this is a high-quality refactoring with no apparent issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants