Add respond_to? Method for ADObject#59
Open
jekhokie wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Add a corresponding respond_to? method for the ADObject in order to ensure that checks calling respond_to? utilize the actual fields (as most methods will not exist due to the lookup being on the symbols rather than the methods).
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @Arcath, Sorry about this but I forgot to commit and include the corresponding respond_to? method for #58. This commit includes the respond_to? method, which will save the lookup from failing every time due to the actual object not having an instance method corresponding to the symbols contained within it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a corresponding respond_to? method for the ADObject in order to
ensure that checks calling respond_to? utilize the actual fields (as
most methods will not exist due to the lookup being on the symbols
rather than the methods).