Skip to content

istio: bump istio for swft envs to asm-1-28 target#4865

Open
bennerv wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
bvesel/bump-istio-rev-to-asm-1-28
Open

istio: bump istio for swft envs to asm-1-28 target#4865
bennerv wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
bvesel/bump-istio-rev-to-asm-1-28

Conversation

@bennerv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bennerv bennerv commented Apr 13, 2026

What

Broken swift environments which don't have istio asm-1-28 revision defined.

az aks mesh get-revisions -l uksouth | jq -r '.[].[].revision'
asm-1-27
asm-1-28
asm-1-29

Why

We need to continuously upgrade istio to ensure it's not out of support. This should not impact any INT/Stage/Prod envs as they have their own defaults defined in config in sdp-pipelines.

Swift environment is treated as ephemeral. Therefore, we should update this to 1-28. Trevor is working on updating non-ephemeral (perf, dev, cspr) using canary upgrades.

Testing

Ran DEPLOY_ENV=swft make entrypoint/Region locally.

Note:

Since this is just updating dev environments, I have no problem changing targetVersion at the same time I remove the older version, even though they happen in order.

If this were to apply itself to an int/stage/prod environment as is, i believe there would be downtime on our istio external gateway because we remove the version we're actively using.

In dev envs, it's not a big deal since it should just work if you're upgrading.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 13, 2026 22:44
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from geoberle and janboll April 13, 2026 22:44
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates dev-environment Istio revision defaults to asm-1-28 so swift/dev deployments don’t fail in regions where asm-1-26 is no longer available.

Changes:

  • Bump dev SVC Istio targetVersion to asm-1-28 and remove asm-1-26 from the supported versions list.
  • Remove redundant per-environment dev overrides now covered by the shared dev default.
  • Refresh Helm template snapshot fixtures to reflect the single Istio revision.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
config/config.yaml Updates dev Istio defaults to asm-1-28 and removes now-redundant overrides.
config/rendered/dev/swft/uksouth.yaml Rendered dev swift config reflects new Istio target/version set.
config/rendered/dev/perf/westus3.yaml Rendered dev perf config reflects new Istio target/version set.
config/rendered/dev/dev/westus3.yaml Rendered dev config reflects new Istio target/version set.
config/rendered/dev/cspr/westus3.yaml Rendered dev cspr config reflects new Istio target/version set.
istio/testdata/zz_fixture_TestHelmTemplate_istio_mise_enabled.yaml Snapshot updated to no longer emit asm-1-26 revision resources.
dev-infrastructure/zz_fixture_TestHelmTemplate_dev_westus3_svc_1_istio.yaml Snapshot updated to no longer emit asm-1-26 revision resources.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@bennerv bennerv force-pushed the bvesel/bump-istio-rev-to-asm-1-28 branch from 967ca38 to 2a3a880 Compare April 13, 2026 23:28
@bennerv bennerv force-pushed the bvesel/bump-istio-rev-to-asm-1-28 branch from 2a3a880 to a7e90b7 Compare April 13, 2026 23:37
@bennerv bennerv changed the title istio: bump istio for dev envs to asm-1-28 target istio: bump istio for swft envs to asm-1-28 target Apr 13, 2026
@trevorwilliams2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 13, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bennerv, trevorwilliams2025

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c150c8f and 2 for PR HEAD a7e90b7 in total

@trevorwilliams2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/test verify

@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0da2d3d and 1 for PR HEAD a7e90b7 in total

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 14, 2026 06:11
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Apr 14, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 14, 2026

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread config/config.yaml
Comment thread config/rendered/dev/swft/uksouth.yaml
@geoberle
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/test e2e-parallel

@bennerv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bennerv commented Apr 14, 2026

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 16, 2026

@bennerv: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/cspr 16ffcc1 link true /test cspr

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants