Skip to content

docs(sdlc): memory that's a process rule = /sdlc gap#418

Merged
BaseInfinity merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/memory-vs-sdlc-guidance
Jun 12, 2026
Merged

docs(sdlc): memory that's a process rule = /sdlc gap#418
BaseInfinity merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/memory-vs-sdlc-guidance

Conversation

@BaseInfinity

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

One-liner in Memory Audit Protocol: if a memory describes a process rule (always/never do X), that's an /sdlc gap — contribute via /feedback instead of patching with private memory.

Context

User insight: people saving memories to compensate for missing SDLC rules indicates a skill gap, not a memory need. Memories should be domain knowledge, not process enforcement.

Option B (detect process-like memories in /setup or /feedback) added to ROADMAP parking lot for future research.

Test plan

  • tests/test-skill-graduations.sh — 6/6
  • tests/test-cowork-drift.sh — 9/9
  • CI validate passes

@BaseInfinity BaseInfinity force-pushed the docs/memory-vs-sdlc-guidance branch from 82e6a91 to 3d5417e Compare June 12, 2026 05:25
If you're saving a memory about a process rule (always/never do X),
that's a signal the SDLC skill is missing something. Use /feedback
to contribute it back rather than patching with private memory.
@BaseInfinity BaseInfinity force-pushed the docs/memory-vs-sdlc-guidance branch from 3d5417e to a44e2ce Compare June 12, 2026 05:27
@BaseInfinity BaseInfinity merged commit 77a2a76 into main Jun 12, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant