Skip to content

add fst::raw::Fst::find_longest_prefix#104

Open
llogiq wants to merge 1 commit intoBurntSushi:masterfrom
llogiq:find_longest_prefix
Open

add fst::raw::Fst::find_longest_prefix#104
llogiq wants to merge 1 commit intoBurntSushi:masterfrom
llogiq:find_longest_prefix

Conversation

@llogiq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@llogiq llogiq commented Apr 8, 2020

This closes #103.

Open question: Should we also introduce the method on FstRef?

@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the find_longest_prefix branch 2 times, most recently from fc7f281 to 95a7a15 Compare April 8, 2020 21:53
@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the find_longest_prefix branch from 95a7a15 to 05ecb76 Compare May 12, 2020 23:09
@Kerollmops
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Kerollmops commented Oct 1, 2020

Hey @llogiq, I am not sure if FstRef is public anyway (checked, it is not). Is this the only blocking point of this PR? I ask because I am interrested in using this API, maybe not right now but in a couple of weeks maybe 😃.

@llogiq
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

llogiq commented Oct 3, 2020

I don't think this should be a blocker. It's only because Fst derefs to FstRef, so implementing it on the latter might allow people to use it even if they already have a FstRef. Haven't met that case yet, though.

@Kerollmops Kerollmops mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

consider adding a tokenizer/scanning routine

2 participants