Skip to content

Conversation

@jmafoster1
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmafoster1 jmafoster1 commented Jan 26, 2026

I removed the try...except block from the causal test adequacy loop as it was only catching warnings and was messing up some results.

I also added alpha as a parameter for MetamorphicRelation.to_json_stub as I wanted to change it.

I have also limited us to pandas 2.x for now, since pandas 3 changes some default behaviour that breaks the tests.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2026

🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ PYTHON black 32 0 0.96s
✅ PYTHON pylint 32 0 6.06s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.86%. Comparing base (4a3e9d7) to head (32fbf15).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #375      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.29%   97.86%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        1554     1544      -10     
==========================================
- Hits         1512     1511       -1     
+ Misses         42       33       -9     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
causal_testing/testing/causal_test_adequacy.py 100.00% <100.00%> (+12.67%) ⬆️
causal_testing/testing/metamorphic_relation.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6325ced...32fbf15. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jmafoster1 jmafoster1 marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2026 10:08
@jmafoster1 jmafoster1 requested a review from f-allian January 26, 2026 10:08
@f-allian f-allian merged commit cd9241f into main Jan 30, 2026
25 checks passed
@jmafoster1 jmafoster1 deleted the jmafoster1/sharr branch January 30, 2026 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants