Use position-based index to avoid reaggregation issues in lines_polys_handler#1002
Closed
Use position-based index to avoid reaggregation issues in lines_polys_handler#1002
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes proposed in this PR:
lines_polys_handlermoduleThis PR fixes #992
Hi!
As discussed in #992 , I tried to implement a quick fix to avoid erreoneous re-aggregation of disaggregated exposures to their original shape which was caused by non-unique index in the exposures GeoDataFrame. To fix it, I simply replaced the original indices by positional indices in the
csr_maskused for theimpact_matreaggregation in_aggregate_impact_mat. This fix seems to do the job for this specific case but I am not entirely sure it works as intended as I was a bit confused about what was going on in the_aggregate_impact_matfunction. For instance, why did we use the original index values to make thecsr_maskas anyways the csr matrices work with positional indices to my understanding. Also, @peanutfun, you can let me know if this fix corresponds to the best solution you mentionned in #992 or not.As a reminder, this is the code that used to create the error (showing up when plotting):
PR Author Checklist
develop)PR Reviewer Checklist