Quantifying Traditional Ecological Knowledge for Decision-Making and Conservation Modeling
Please remember to cite the ethnobotanyR package if you use it in your
publications. Use citation("ethnobotanyR") to get a citation for the
latest version.
To cite package 'ethnobotanyR' in publications use:
Whitney C (2022). _ethnobotanyR: Ethnobotanical Analysis, Decision-Framing,
and TEK Modeling_. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.ethnobotanyR
<https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.ethnobotanyR>, R package
version 0.2.0, <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ethnobotanyR>.
A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
@Manual{,
title = {ethnobotanyR: Ethnobotanical Analysis, Decision-Framing, and TEK Modeling},
author = {Cory Whitney},
year = {2022},
note = {R package version 0.2.0},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ethnobotanyR},
doi = {10.32614/CRAN.package.ethnobotanyR},
}
ethnobotanyR provides tools to:
- Quantify Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) using standard indices (Use Value, Relative Frequency of Citation, Relative Importance, etc.)
- Model TEK in decision frameworks using Bayesian networks and Monte Carlo sampling
- Design and facilitate decision-framing exercises in conservation and development contexts
- Visualize and communicate TEK distributions and decision-relevant uncertainty to stakeholders
- Disaggregate knowledge by stakeholder type, gender, geography, and other meaningful dimensions
- Make decisions for you. Ethnobotanical indices and models describe what communities know and value; they don't determine conservation strategy or predict outcomes.
- Offer robust proof through indices alone. Standard quantitative ethnobotany indices have well-known scientific limitations. See
vignette("honest_ethnobotany")for a critical assessment. - Replace participatory engagement. Quantification is a tool for making knowledge visible and facilitating dialogue—not a substitute for honest, power-aware conversation about values and tradeoffs.
Start with: vignette("ethnobotanyr_vignette")
Use cases:
- Calculate Use Value (UV), Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), and other indices
- Compare knowledge across demographic groups
- Identify patterns in ethnobotanical knowledge
- Important: Read
vignette("honest_ethnobotany")first to understand limitations of indices
Key principle: Indices are descriptive tools. Report them with transparency, disaggregate by meaningful groups, and avoid causal claims.
Start with: vignette("TEK_modeling_vignette")
Use cases:
- Elicit TEK as probability distributions (Beta, Dirichlet priors)
- Build Bayesian networks that propagate TEK-derived uncertainty
- Run Monte Carlo simulations to explore decision outcomes under uncertainty
- Integrate qualitative knowledge into quantitative decision models
Key principle: This is the robust approach. You're modeling uncertainty, not pretending precision where there is none.
Start with: vignette("decision_framing_guide")
Use cases:
- Design multi-stakeholder engagement processes
- Clarify community priorities and surface disagreement
- Create decision spaces that honor multiple values
- Integrate ethnobotanical knowledge into community-led decisions
- Navigate power dynamics and structural constraints honestly
Supporting resources:
vignette("benin_case_study")- Critical case study of fonio value-chain workshopvignette("ethnobotanyr_decision_framing_practical")- How to use ethnobotanyR functions in workshopsvignette("honest_ethnobotany")- Critical assessment of what ethnobotanical data can and cannot show
Install the released version of ethnobotanyR from
CRAN with
install.packages("ethnobotanyR").
Install the working version of ethnobotanyR from
GitHub with
devtools::install_github("CWWhitney/ethnobotanyR").
Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino, Patricia Muniz de Medeiros, Washington Soares Ferreira Junior, Taline Cristina da Silva, Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva, and Thiago Goncalves-Souza. 2019. Social-Ecological Theory of Maximization: Basic Concepts and Two Initial Models. Biological Theory. doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00316-8.
Tardio, J., and M. Pardo-de-Santayana, 2008. Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain) 1. Economic Botany, 62(1), 24-39. doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5.
Whitney, C. W., Bahati, J., and Gebauer, J. (2018), Ethnobotany and agrobiodiversity; valuation of plants in the homegardens of southwestern Uganda. Ethnobiology Letters, 9(2), 90-100. doi.org/10.14237/ebl.9.2.2018.503.
Whitney C (2022). ethnobotanyR: Ethnobotanical Analysis, Decision-Framing, and TEK Modeling. R package version 0.2.0, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ethnobotanyR.

