Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
I opened doxygen/doxygen#12050 for that broken Reinterop link, but otherwise the classes/files should be generating as expected. |
Contributor
Author
Turns out there was a setting added in |
Contributor
|
Thanks @j9liu! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Our Unity docs were broken after #642 because the documentation path for it had not been updated for the new folder structure. This fixes that path.
Issue number or link
N/A
Author checklist
[ ] I have updatedCHANGES.mdwith a short summary of my change (for user-facing changes).[ ] I have added or updated unit tests to ensure consistent code coverage as necessary.Testing plan
The docs should work locally using
npm run doxygen.