Skip to content
@CommonIntents

CommonIntents

CommonIntents-144 — the open protocol family for AI-native interaction. INTENT-7 defines what AI wants. CAPABILITY-13 defines what AI can do. Trust must be proven, not assumed.


📖 Where to start?

I want to... Start here
Understand the big picture Constitution (scroll down)
Integrate INTENT-7 into my tool INTENT-7 SpecificationMapping Guide
Add HITL approval to my workflow CAPABILITY-13 Specification
Understand how transport binding works BIND-19 Specification
Set up secure mTLS transport INTENT-7-SECURE Specification
See a working reference implementation Cellrix
Contribute to the protocols Contributing Guide

INTENT-7/CAPABILITY-13 Protocol Family Constitution

License Org 简体中文

Version: 1.0.0-draft Status: Working Group Internal Draft Date: 2026-05-22 License: Apache 2.0


1. Problem Statement

Existing AI agent interaction protocols suffer from the following structural deficiencies:

  • Centralized trust root: Trust anchored in a single Host node; single point of failure leads to global collapse.
  • Static permission model: Permissions have no time-bound constraints; once granted, held permanently.
  • Blocking human-machine collaboration: HITL is a synchronous model; the human becomes the system bottleneck.
  • Abdication of security responsibility: The protocol only handles connections; security implementation is pushed downstream.
  • Mandatory feature design: All features are forced upon users; no on-demand activation mechanism.

2. Philosophical Foundation

Core Belief

Trust must be proven, not assumed.

3. Protocol Stack Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              INTENT-7                         │
│  Common Intent Specification             │
│  · Pure intent semantic standard         │
│  · Transport-agnostic, crypto-agnostic   │
│  · Backend-agnostic                      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ▲ Semantic Binding
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              BIND-19                         │
│  INTENT-7/Transport Binding Protocol          │
│  · Transport format negotiation          │
│  · Integrity check negotiation           │
│  · Version compatibility declaration     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ▲ Currently Bound To
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              INTENT-7-SECURE                        │
│  Secure Intent & Control Protocol        │
│  · mTLS end-to-end encrypted transport   │
│  · Client certificate identity proof     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ▲ Carried By
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CAPABILITY-13                         │
│  Capability Authentication Protocol      │
│  · Capability declaration                │
│  · Asynchronous decision queue           │
│  · Lease extension                       │
│  · Audit extension                       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

5. Separation of Concerns

Domain Responsible Party
Intent semantics INTENT-7 Protocol
Transport binding, format negotiation, integrity BIND-19 Protocol
Interaction standards and security semantics CAPABILITY-13 Protocol
Message queue infrastructure Existing middleware
Identity infrastructure Existing TLS/PKI ecosystem
Storage and persistence Application decides
Business permission logic Application implements

The protocol defines only interaction semantic standards. Anything that does not define semantics but only mandates implementation methods is not within the protocol's scope of responsibility.


6. Design Principles

  1. Minimal Core, Optional Extensions: CAPABILITY-13 Core contains only irreducible atomic functions.
  2. Declarative Activation, On-Demand Execution: Advanced features are activated only when explicitly declared; not declared means zero overhead.
  3. Separation of Concerns, Ecosystem Synergy: Protocol defines semantic standards; infrastructure provides implementation pipelines.
  4. Zero-Dependency Ready, Progressive Enhancement: Basic compatibility requires only HTTP + JSON.
  5. Maximum Embrace, Minimum Exclusion: Define only "what is correct," not "how to do it."
  6. Semantically Pure, Transport-Agnostic, Backend-Agnostic: INTENT-7 is an eternal intent language, isolating all changes through BIND-19 and the static mapping layer.

7. Protocol Status

Protocol Status Responsibility
INTENT-7 Existing, continuously evolving Common intent syntactic standard
BIND-19 Drafting in progress Transport binding, format negotiation, integrity assurance
INTENT-7-SECURE Current implementation based on BIND-19 mTLS secure transport
CAPABILITY-13 Drafting in progress Capability authentication and HITL decisions
CAPS Future phase Decentralized swarm trust network

All protocol specifications are published via content addressing (CID). Their authoritative versions are identified by CID, independent of any specific platform or storage service.

Reference Implementation Status
Cellrix Continuously evolving

This constitution is maintained by the INTENT-7/CAPABILITY-13 Protocol Working Group.

Popular repositories Loading

  1. INTENT-7 INTENT-7 Public

    Structured Intent Description Language (SIDL) — syntactic standard for AI-native intent expression

    1

  2. CAPABILITY-13 CAPABILITY-13 Public

    Capability authentication & asynchronous HITL decision standard

  3. BIND-19 BIND-19 Public

    CIS/transport binding — format negotiation & integrity

  4. INTENT-7-SECURE INTENT-7-SECURE Public

    Optional mTLS reference implementation for CIB transport binding

  5. .github .github Public

Repositories

Showing 5 of 5 repositories

People

This organization has no public members. You must be a member to see who’s a part of this organization.

Top languages

Loading…

Most used topics

Loading…