CommonIntents-144 — the open protocol family for AI-native interaction. INTENT-7 defines what AI wants. CAPABILITY-13 defines what AI can do. Trust must be proven, not assumed.
| I want to... | Start here |
|---|---|
| Understand the big picture | Constitution (scroll down) |
| Integrate INTENT-7 into my tool | INTENT-7 Specification → Mapping Guide |
| Add HITL approval to my workflow | CAPABILITY-13 Specification |
| Understand how transport binding works | BIND-19 Specification |
| Set up secure mTLS transport | INTENT-7-SECURE Specification |
| See a working reference implementation | Cellrix |
| Contribute to the protocols | Contributing Guide |
Version: 1.0.0-draft Status: Working Group Internal Draft Date: 2026-05-22 License: Apache 2.0
Existing AI agent interaction protocols suffer from the following structural deficiencies:
- Centralized trust root: Trust anchored in a single Host node; single point of failure leads to global collapse.
- Static permission model: Permissions have no time-bound constraints; once granted, held permanently.
- Blocking human-machine collaboration: HITL is a synchronous model; the human becomes the system bottleneck.
- Abdication of security responsibility: The protocol only handles connections; security implementation is pushed downstream.
- Mandatory feature design: All features are forced upon users; no on-demand activation mechanism.
Trust must be proven, not assumed.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INTENT-7 │
│ Common Intent Specification │
│ · Pure intent semantic standard │
│ · Transport-agnostic, crypto-agnostic │
│ · Backend-agnostic │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲ Semantic Binding
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ BIND-19 │
│ INTENT-7/Transport Binding Protocol │
│ · Transport format negotiation │
│ · Integrity check negotiation │
│ · Version compatibility declaration │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲ Currently Bound To
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INTENT-7-SECURE │
│ Secure Intent & Control Protocol │
│ · mTLS end-to-end encrypted transport │
│ · Client certificate identity proof │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲ Carried By
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CAPABILITY-13 │
│ Capability Authentication Protocol │
│ · Capability declaration │
│ · Asynchronous decision queue │
│ · Lease extension │
│ · Audit extension │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Domain | Responsible Party |
|---|---|
| Intent semantics | INTENT-7 Protocol |
| Transport binding, format negotiation, integrity | BIND-19 Protocol |
| Interaction standards and security semantics | CAPABILITY-13 Protocol |
| Message queue infrastructure | Existing middleware |
| Identity infrastructure | Existing TLS/PKI ecosystem |
| Storage and persistence | Application decides |
| Business permission logic | Application implements |
The protocol defines only interaction semantic standards. Anything that does not define semantics but only mandates implementation methods is not within the protocol's scope of responsibility.
- Minimal Core, Optional Extensions: CAPABILITY-13 Core contains only irreducible atomic functions.
- Declarative Activation, On-Demand Execution: Advanced features are activated only when explicitly declared; not declared means zero overhead.
- Separation of Concerns, Ecosystem Synergy: Protocol defines semantic standards; infrastructure provides implementation pipelines.
- Zero-Dependency Ready, Progressive Enhancement: Basic compatibility requires only HTTP + JSON.
- Maximum Embrace, Minimum Exclusion: Define only "what is correct," not "how to do it."
- Semantically Pure, Transport-Agnostic, Backend-Agnostic: INTENT-7 is an eternal intent language, isolating all changes through BIND-19 and the static mapping layer.
| Protocol | Status | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| INTENT-7 | Existing, continuously evolving | Common intent syntactic standard |
| BIND-19 | Drafting in progress | Transport binding, format negotiation, integrity assurance |
| INTENT-7-SECURE | Current implementation based on BIND-19 | mTLS secure transport |
| CAPABILITY-13 | Drafting in progress | Capability authentication and HITL decisions |
| CAPS | Future phase | Decentralized swarm trust network |
All protocol specifications are published via content addressing (CID). Their authoritative versions are identified by CID, independent of any specific platform or storage service.
| Reference Implementation | Status |
|---|---|
| Cellrix | Continuously evolving |
This constitution is maintained by the INTENT-7/CAPABILITY-13 Protocol Working Group.