chore(rec-28): drop CppCompositeTypeTest.testJ5_32_syntactic_layout commented-body stub — wip sweep#37
Merged
CryptoJones merged 1 commit intoMay 26, 2026
Conversation
…ommented-body stub — wip sweep Rec 28 #28-6d+ active-@ignore sweep, eighth wip-bucket deletion. The removed method is the trailing test in the file with EVERY executable statement commented out: // @test // <- @test itself commented out @ignore("wip: misc cluster — undocumented bare-ignore NationalSecurityAgency#192") public void testJ5_32_syntactic_layout() throws Exception { // SyntacticClass structJ5 = createSyntacticStructJ5(MsftVxtManager32); // TODO: determine if we need a builder that inputs a SyntacticClass... //structJ5.createLayoutFromSyntacticDescription(MsftVxtManager32, ...); // //Composite composite = structJ5.getComposite(); //CompositeTestUtils.assertExpectedComposite(this, getExpectedJ5_32(), ...); } Zero executable lines. The author commented out @test, kept the body commented, and left an @ignore — meaning JUnit would not run this either way. fix-or-delete: delete; issue NationalSecurityAgency#192 retains the "determine if we need a builder for SyntacticClass" TODO record. Updates docs/testing/ignore-test-inventory.md: - wip: 37 → 36 - total properly-categorized: 57 → 56 Closes NationalSecurityAgency#192 (CppCompositeTypeTest portion). Proudly Made in Nebraska. Go Big Red! 🌽 https://xkcd.com/2347/ Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
CryptoJones
deleted the
chore/rec-28-delete-CppCompositeTypeTest-J5-syntactic-stub
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rec 28 #28-6d+ active-
@Ignoresweep, eighth wip-bucket deletion. The removed method is the trailing test in the file with EVERY executable statement commented out:// SyntacticClass structJ5 = createSyntacticStructJ5(MsftVxtManager32);
// TODO: determine if we need a builder that inputs a SyntacticClass...
//structJ5.createLayoutFromSyntacticDescription(MsftVxtManager32, ...);
//
//Composite composite = structJ5.getComposite();
//CompositeTestUtils.assertExpectedComposite(this, getExpectedJ5_32(), ...);
}
Zero executable lines. The author commented out
@Test, kept the body commented, and left an@Ignore— meaning JUnit would not run this either way. fix-or-delete: delete; issue NationalSecurityAgency#192 retains the "determine if we need a builder for SyntacticClass" TODO record.Updates
docs/testing/ignore-test-inventory.md:Closes NationalSecurityAgency#192 (CppCompositeTypeTest portion).
Proudly Made in Nebraska. Go Big Red! 🌽 https://xkcd.com/2347/