docs(rec-28): make inventory's #28-6c row honest about post-deletion artifact loss#53
Merged
CryptoJones merged 1 commit intoMay 26, 2026
Conversation
…artifact loss The `#28-6c` row in `docs/testing/ignore-test-inventory.md` described the deadline-label rollout as "shipped" without acknowledging that its central artifacts (18 GitHub tracking issues NationalSecurityAgency#159, NationalSecurityAgency#160, NationalSecurityAgency#161, NationalSecurityAgency#162, NationalSecurityAgency#176, NationalSecurityAgency#177, NationalSecurityAgency#179, NationalSecurityAgency#180, NationalSecurityAgency#181, NationalSecurityAgency#182, NationalSecurityAgency#183, NationalSecurityAgency#187, NationalSecurityAgency#188, NationalSecurityAgency#189, NationalSecurityAgency#190, NationalSecurityAgency#191, NationalSecurityAgency#192, NationalSecurityAgency#193) were destroyed in the 2026-05-24 repo- deletion incident. The labels themselves were recreated on the new repo (`ignore:30d / 90d / 1y` exist now); the issues did NOT come back, and the in-tree `@Ignore` annotations still reference those dead `#N` numbers. Updated description: - Calls out the pre-deletion vs. post-deletion split explicitly. - Cross-links to the Apologies.md entry that owns the artifact loss. - Records the agreed mitigation (re-file the 18 tracking issues opportunistically as each annotation is touched, per Apologies). - New status string: "shipped pre-deletion; artifacts destroyed; labels-recreated, issues not" — accurate vs. the previous misleading "shipped". This is bookkeeping only; no test code or audit task changes. Proudly Made in Nebraska. Go Big Red! 🌽 https://xkcd.com/2347/ Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
#28-6crow indocs/testing/ignore-test-inventory.mddescribed the deadline-label rollout as "shipped" without acknowledging that its central artifacts — 18 GitHub tracking issues (NationalSecurityAgency#159, NationalSecurityAgency#160, NationalSecurityAgency#161, NationalSecurityAgency#162, NationalSecurityAgency#176, NationalSecurityAgency#177, NationalSecurityAgency#179, NationalSecurityAgency#180, NationalSecurityAgency#181, NationalSecurityAgency#182, NationalSecurityAgency#183, NationalSecurityAgency#187, NationalSecurityAgency#188, NationalSecurityAgency#189, NationalSecurityAgency#190, NationalSecurityAgency#191, NationalSecurityAgency#192, NationalSecurityAgency#193) — were destroyed in the 2026-05-24 repo-deletion incident. The labels themselves were recreated on the new repo (ignore:30d / 90d / 1yexist now); the issues did NOT come back, and the in-tree@Ignoreannotations still reference those dead#Nnumbers.Updated description:
Apologies.mdentry that owns the artifact loss.Bookkeeping only; no test code or audit task changes. Surfaced during the 2026-05-26 self-audit.
Proudly Made in Nebraska. Go Big Red! 🌽 https://xkcd.com/2347/