Skip to content

fix: reproducuble bomrefs component based - #1583

Open
jkowalleck wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
feat/reproducuble-bomrefs-component-based
Open

fix: reproducuble bomrefs component based#1583
jkowalleck wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
feat/reproducuble-bomrefs-component-based

Conversation

@jkowalleck

@jkowalleck jkowalleck commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Reproducible bom-refs might have had almost constant values over multiple builds of different projects.
This is not an issue, since bom-ref values are technically allowed to be the same in various SBOMs, but this might have lead to conflicts in downstream use cases.

new: reproducible bom-refs are component-based and still are reproducible for unique value parts.

at the point of adding those hashes, the bom-ref are already set to <package-name>@<version>>

similar to CycloneDX/cyclonedx-esbuild#185

AI Tool Disclosure

  • My contribution does not include any AI-generated content
  • My contribution includes AI-generated content, as disclosed below:
    • AI Tools: [e.g. GitHub CoPilot, ChatGPT, JetBrains Junie etc.]
    • LLMs and versions: [e.g. GPT-4.1, Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 2.5 Pro etc.]
    • Prompts: [Summarize the key prompts or instructions given to the AI tools]

Affirmation

Signed-off-by: Jan Kowalleck <jan.kowalleck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kowalleck <jan.kowalleck@gmail.com>
@jkowalleck
jkowalleck requested a review from a team as a code owner July 28, 2026 08:23
@jkowalleck jkowalleck added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 28, 2026
@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric Results
Complexity 0 (≤ 20 complexity)
Duplication 0

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage 100.00% diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation +0.00% coverage variation
Diff coverage 100.00% diff coverage (80.00%)

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (1c021bb) 2895 2691 92.95%
Head commit (e7ebf0f) 2895 (+0) 2691 (+0) 92.95% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#1583) 1 1 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kowalleck <jan.kowalleck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kowalleck <jan.kowalleck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kowalleck <jan.kowalleck@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant