Bump to version 2.35.0

[Strech]

Added

• Tracing: Add dynamic_service SQL comment propagation mode for Database Monitoring (feat: add dynamic_service dbm propagation #5812)
• Tracing: Prevent Datadog-generated traffic from interfering with application metrics ([APPSEC-62377] Collect Datadog request attribution headers #5811)

Changed

• AppSec: Improve route extraction performance for Rails applications ([APPSEC-62723] Add Rails fast path for RouteExtractor #5836)

Fixed

• Tracing: Restore Datadog::Tracing::Contrib::Ext::Metadata::TAG_BASE_SERVICE constant removed in v2.34.0 (Fix NameError: uninitialized constant Datadog::Tracing::Contrib::Ext::Metadata::TAG_BASE_SERVICE  #5830)

Removed

• Profiling: Deprecate the profiling.advanced.timeline_enabled setting for removal; it no longer does anything. Please remove it from Datadog.configure and do not set DD_PROFILING_TIMELINE_ENABLED (Deprecate the timeline_enabled option which is redundant with gvl_enabled #5750)

[dd-octo-sts]

👋 Hey @Strech, please fill "Change log entry" section in the pull request description.

If changes need to be present in CHANGELOG.md you can state it this way

**Change log entry**

Yes. A brief summary to be placed into the CHANGELOG.md

(possible answers Yes/Yep/Yeah)

Or you can opt out like that

**Change log entry**

None.

(possible answers No/Nope/None)

^{Visited at: 2026-06-03 08:48:46 UTC}

[datadog-official]

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 97.08% (-0.01%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: a376e45 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-03 09:14:31

Comparing candidate commit a376e45 in PR branch bump_to_version_2.35.0 with baseline commit 8ecec22 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 45 metrics, 1 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'