Conversation
…rlevels_transducer_transfer modules
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR reorganizes the cleanup locations process to run earlier in the transfer pipeline and adds robust timestamp handling for deployment sorting.
Changes:
- Moved cleanup locations logic from the
main()function into Phase 5 of_transfer_parallel()to execute earlier in the pipeline - Added a helper function
_install_ts()to safely convert various date formats to pandas Timestamps when sorting deployments by installation date
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| transfers/waterlevels_transducer_transfer.py | Adds timestamp conversion helper to handle different date formats when sorting deployments |
| transfers/transfer.py | Moves cleanup locations from end of main() to Phase 5 in _transfer_parallel() for earlier execution |
| return value | ||
| if hasattr(value, "date"): | ||
| return Timestamp(value) | ||
| return Timestamp(pd.to_datetime(value, errors="coerce")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When pd.to_datetime(value, errors='coerce') returns NaT (Not a Time), converting it to Timestamp could cause sorting issues. Consider adding error handling or validation to ensure valid timestamps are returned, or document that NaT values are acceptable for sorting.
| return Timestamp(pd.to_datetime(value, errors="coerce")) | |
| dt = pd.to_datetime(value, errors="coerce") | |
| if pd.isna(dt): | |
| # Use a maximal timestamp so invalid/missing dates sort last | |
| return Timestamp.max | |
| return Timestamp(dt) |
| logger.info(f"no {release_status} records for pointid {pointid}") | ||
| continue | ||
|
|
||
| def _install_ts(value): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function name _install_ts is ambiguous. Consider renaming to _convert_to_timestamp or _normalize_installation_timestamp to better convey its purpose of converting various date formats to Timestamp objects.
| # very time consuming and we want to run it alone in its own phase. | ||
|
|
||
| # ========================================================================= | ||
| # PHASE 5: Cleanup locations. populate state, county, quadname |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comment uses lowercase 'populate' which is inconsistent with the capitalization style used in other phase comments. Consider capitalizing to 'Populate' for consistency.
| # PHASE 5: Cleanup locations. populate state, county, quadname | |
| # PHASE 5: Cleanup locations. Populate state, county, quadname |
1 participant
Why
This PR addresses the following problem / context:
How
Implementation summary - the following was changed / added / removed:
Notes
Any special considerations, workarounds, or follow-up work to note?