Add the two current workflows to this fork#11
Conversation
|
managed to recover the draft IWC tests. Will get the main one working too, then make a PR for the main IWC repository. |
|
@fubar2 I made a PR to the IWC to make things easier, galaxyproject#559 |
@Delphine-L: Thanks! #557 has the two WF I'd like to take forward as EBPhib-describe and EBPhib-dimer-coverage. Both those WF pass planemo tests when run from my machine, but there is a strange error in the CI so the tests don't actually seem to run here on github although they "pass". Sample test files are in https://github.com/fubar2/iwc/tree/EBPhisb/workflows/VGP-assembly-v2/EBPhib-descriptive/test-data and in https://github.com/fubar2/iwc/tree/EBPhisb/workflows/VGP-assembly-v2/EBPhib-dimer-coverage-SV/test-data The pretext WF is one I don't know anything about. It seems to be generating stand-alone images rather than tracks to be integrated into JBrowse2, and needs test data starting with matching subsamples of HiC F/R reads, to map against subsampled haplotype fasta. Fake telomere/gap bed features are easy to make up, and the small HiC reads and the small haplotypes can be mapped and the bam converted to a small coverage bigwig. Maybe easiest if it becomes an EBPhib subWF because the arima data is the only thing missing |
Just lost a few days work trying to push this - my git-fu is too weak and it will be much safer for me if we work in a real repository :(