🛡️ Sentinel: [CRITICAL/HIGH] Fix Unbounded CLI Arguments (DoS)#50
🛡️ Sentinel: [CRITICAL/HIGH] Fix Unbounded CLI Arguments (DoS)#50
Conversation
Co-authored-by: EiJackGH <172181576+EiJackGH@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: EiJackGH <172181576+EiJackGH@users.noreply.github.com>
|
What is DoS worked in Jules? |
Co-authored-by: EiJackGH <172181576+EiJackGH@users.noreply.github.com>
🚨 Severity: HIGH
💡 Vulnerability: The simulation script accepted unbounded values for 'days', allowing potential Denial of Service (DoS) via resource exhaustion. It also lacked validation for negative inputs (cash, price, volatility).
🎯 Impact: Could cause application crash or incorrect simulation results if exploited.
🔧 Fix: Refactored 'bitcoin_trading_simulation.py' to use a 'main()' function and added strict input validation (days > 0 and <= 36500, non-negative cash/volatility). Also cleaned up duplicate code blocks.
✅ Verification: Added 'test_security.py' to verify invalid inputs are rejected gracefully.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 11889021400264498482 started by @EiJackGH