Plan safe migrate-once backend CI acceleration#185
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughWS-CI-001 planning records were amended to classify PR ChangesWS-CI-001 planning and successor contracts
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/chunks/WS-CI-001-02A-safe-migrate-once-database-reset.md:
- Around line 33-51: Replace the broad status, review, and evidence categories
in WS-CI-001-02A-safe-migrate-once-database-reset.md (lines 33-51) with every
exact permitted path; apply the same explicit-path allowlist to
WS-CI-001-02B-exact-custody-semantic-test-lanes.md (lines 27-41). In PLAN.md
(lines 162-169), retain the exact-scope claim only after both contracts enforce
these enumerated paths.
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/chunks/WS-CI-001-02B-exact-custody-semantic-test-lanes.md:
- Around line 12-17: Update the Preconditions section to state that contributor
source is limited to the two listed immutable SHAs; later commits are ineligible
unless a subsequent contract explicitly names their immutable SHAs and file
scope.
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/reviews/WS-CI-001-02-internal-review-evidence.md:
- Around line 81-84: Update the custody wording in the PR `#180` evidence bullets
to state that adoption requires 02A custody to be signed, or equivalently
requires a signed 02A start; preserve the surrounding discovery-source and
future-evidence statements unchanged.
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/reviews/WS-CI-001-02-pr-trust-bundle.md:
- Around line 3-7: Rename the trust-bundle title in the `WS-CI-001-02` chunk to
describe the planning amendment and its 02A reset-safety successor instead of
deferred routing, cache, and timing work. Update the corresponding title or
summary field in the `WS-CI-001-02` merge-intent metadata so both declarations
remain synchronized.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: d47ca20d-c959-4a3e-919a-823ee7b0bfdc
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/CHUNK_MAP.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/DECISIONS.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/DISCOVERY.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/PLAN.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/RISKS.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/STATUS.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/chunks/WS-CI-001-02-safe-routing-cache-timing.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/chunks/WS-CI-001-02A-safe-migrate-once-database-reset.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/chunks/WS-CI-001-02B-exact-custody-semantic-test-lanes.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/chunks/WS-CI-001-03-safe-routing-cache-timing-reassessment.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/reviews/WS-CI-001-02-internal-review-evidence.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-001-backend-ci-acceleration/reviews/WS-CI-001-02-pr-trust-bundle.md.agent-loop/merge-intents/WS-CI-001-02.json
PR Trust Bundle
Chunk
WS-CI-001-02— Safe Routing, Cache, and Timing RefinementMerge intent:
.agent-loop/merge-intents/WS-CI-001-02.jsonGoal
Turn measured CI evidence and contributor PR #180 into prospective, bounded
implementation contracts without retroactively authorizing its code.
Human-approved intent
The user directed the orchestrator to preserve strict zero-trust loop
engineering, review PR #180, and make the contributor work adoptable through
the normal plan, chunk, evidence, and PR process.
What changed
Why it changed
PR #180 demonstrates a promising migrate-once direction, but its original diff
crosses destructive database reset and workflow-topology boundaries and lacked
prospective signed scope and complete exact-execution evidence.
Design chosen
First prove runner-owned destructive reset containment under the existing CI
topology. Then, under a separate signed chunk, change to dependency-based lanes
with independent node, coverage, PostgreSQL, and MinIO custody.
Alternatives rejected
cannot authorize implementation.
do not address repeated migrations.
Scope control
Only WS-CI-001 planning, decision, risk, status, chunk-contract, review, and one
merge-intent file change. No workflow, backend, test, dependency, coverage, or
product runtime file changes.
Product behavior
Acceptance criteria proof
Tests/checks run
python3 scripts/update_post_merge_memory.py validate-merge-intent --repository-root . --base-ref origin/main python3 scripts/test_agent_gates.py python3 scripts/check_loop_memory_state.py python3 scripts/check_markdown_links.py python3 scripts/check_stale_workstream_wording.py python3 scripts/check_stale_authorization_docs.py python3 scripts/check_stale_artifact_contracts.py git diff --check origin/main...HEADAll passed; 95 Agent Gate tests passed.
Test delta
No executable tests changed. Future contracts prohibit removed, skipped,
deselected, or weakened tests and require exact collection/completion proof.
CI integrity
Reviewer results
Reviewed code SHA: c10f084
Reviewed at: 2026-07-22T11:12:00Z
Reviewer run IDs: eng006_senior_arch_docs, eng006_qa_ci_tests, eng006_security_ops_reuse
All nine required tracks passed after the documented repairs, with no remaining
condition or blocker.
External review
PR #180 supplied discovery and contributor measurements. Its review findings
were incorporated into prospective contracts; it remains unauthorized for
merge under this planning chunk. Fresh GitHub and CodeRabbit review will run on
this planning PR.
Remaining risks
02A must prove destructive reset safety, and 02B must prove hosted exact-node,
coverage, isolation, and timing custody. Neither implementation is authorized
by this PR alone.
Follow-up work
After this PR merges and automation reconciles it, dispatch a signed start for
02A only. Do not start 02B or 03 automatically.
Human review focus
Human merge ownership
Summary by CodeRabbit