Skip to content

[TESTING][IGNORE]#690

Closed
DavidJForgeFlow wants to merge 9 commits into
18.0from
18.0-mig-rma_account_unreconciled
Closed

[TESTING][IGNORE]#690
DavidJForgeFlow wants to merge 9 commits into
18.0from
18.0-mig-rma_account_unreconciled

Conversation

@DavidJForgeFlow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

ChrisOForgeFlow and others added 9 commits March 1, 2026 11:56
…ompute method fails.

[IMP] rma: use rma user in tests
[FIX] rma_account: move_line_id field string
[IMP] rma, rma_account, rma_sale, rma_purchase: tests for stock valuation
[FIX] account_move_line_rma_order_line: minor lint, make auto-install
[IMP] rma_account_unreconciled: use manager user in test
Otherwise the anglo saxon entries won't be correct.
For example, the Interim (Delivered) account should balance
after receiving and triggering a refund on a customer rma.
…ency

RMA lines should be able to reconcile either with OCA or Enterprise reconcile tools.
- **Pattern**: `attrs="{'invisible':[('field', '=', value)]}"` → `invisible="expression"`
- **Before**: `attrs="{'invisible':[('unreconciled', '=', False)]}"`
- **After**: `invisible="not unreconciled"`
- **Rule**: Convert attrs dict with invisible key to direct invisible attribute using Python-like expression syntax
- `__manifest__.py`: Only version bump 16.0 → 18.0
- `models/rma_line.py`: No changes
- `tests/test_rma_account_unreconciled.py`: No changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants