Skip to content

Conversation

@Gambitnl
Copy link
Owner

@Gambitnl Gambitnl commented Aug 2, 2025

Summary

  • add React/TypeScript scaffold for village generation
  • include WFC ruleset, generation service, hook, and rendering components
  • add web UI with feature toggles and generate button

Testing

  • npm --prefix web test
  • npm --prefix web run build

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_688e523f6438832fa06a4bdd434be5d7

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
town-generator-os ❌ Failed (Inspect) Aug 2, 2025 9:35pm

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Gambitnl, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've scaffolded a new React and TypeScript project to implement a village generator. This pull request sets up the foundational web UI, integrates the Wave Function Collapse (WFC) algorithm for procedural generation, and provides controls for customizing village features. The goal is to provide a functional and interactive tool for generating diverse village layouts.

Highlights

  • Project Scaffolding: I've initialized a new React/TypeScript application within the web/ directory, setting up the basic project structure, dependencies, and build configuration.
  • Wave Function Collapse (WFC) Integration: I've implemented the core village generation logic using the Wave Function Collapse (WFC) algorithm, including defining specific WFC tiles and their adjacency rules to ensure coherent and varied village layouts.
  • Interactive Web UI: I've developed a user interface with React components that allows users to configure village generation parameters, such as type (farming, fishing, fortified), size (small, medium), and toggle the inclusion of specific features like farmlands, markets, walls, and wells.
  • Village Rendering Components: I've created reusable React components for rendering the procedurally generated village layout visually using SVG, displaying elements like roads, buildings, and walls.
  • Build and Dependency Setup: I've established the necessary build and dependency management setup for the React application, including package.json, package-lock.json, tsconfig.json, and .gitignore.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a solid foundation for a village generation feature using React and TypeScript with the Wave Function Collapse algorithm. The code is generally well-structured. I've provided some specific feedback on areas that could be improved, mainly focusing on enhancing type safety, removing redundant code, and handling potential errors. Key suggestions include improving type safety in event handlers and configuration files, adding error handling for asynchronous operations, and simplifying logic in the layout transformation service. Overall, great work on scaffolding this new feature.

const handleSelect = (
key: 'type' | 'size'
) => (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLSelectElement>) => {
setOptions((prev) => ({ ...prev, [key]: e.target.value as any }));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Using as any bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which can hide bugs. It's better to use a more specific type assertion to maintain type safety.

    setOptions((prev) => ({ ...prev, [key]: e.target.value as VillageOptions['type'] | VillageOptions['size'] }));

Comment on lines +27 to +29
generateWfcGrid(seed, options).then((grid) => {
setVillageLayout(transformGridToLayout(grid, options));
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The promise returned by generateWfcGrid is not being checked for errors. If the promise rejects (e.g., due to an issue in the WFC library), it will result in an unhandled promise rejection, which can crash the application. You should add a .catch() block to handle potential errors gracefully.

Suggested change
generateWfcGrid(seed, options).then((grid) => {
setVillageLayout(transformGridToLayout(grid, options));
});
generateWfcGrid(seed, options).then((grid) => {
setVillageLayout(transformGridToLayout(grid, options));
}).catch(err => console.error('Failed to generate WFC grid', err));

Comment on lines +134 to +140
if (!allowWalls) layout.walls = [];
if (!allowFarmland)
layout.buildings = layout.buildings.filter((b) => b.type !== 'farmland');
if (!allowMarket)
layout.buildings = layout.buildings.filter((b) => b.type !== 'market');
if (!allowWells)
layout.buildings = layout.buildings.filter((b) => b.type !== 'well');

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The filtering logic at the end of this function is redundant and inefficient. The allow... flags are already checked within the forEach loop before adding elements to the layout arrays. These final filtering steps iterate over the arrays again unnecessarily. You can safely remove these lines.

"scripts": {
"start": "npm run build -- --watch",
"build": "tsc",
"test": "echo 'No tests specified'"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The test script is currently a placeholder that echoes a message. The pull request description mentions running tests with npm --prefix web test. It would be good to either implement some basic tests or update the description to reflect the current state.

<label style={{ marginLeft: '1rem' }}>
<input
type="checkbox"
checked={options.includeFarmland !== false}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The expression options.includeFarmland !== false is a bit verbose. Since options.includeFarmland will hold a boolean value after initialization, you can simplify this to just checked={options.includeFarmland}. This simplification can be applied to the other similar checkboxes as well.

            checked={!!options.includeFarmland}

}

export const SubmapPane: React.FC<Props> = ({ currentWorldBiomeId }) => {
const options: VillageOptions = { type: 'farming', size: 'small' };

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The VillageOptions are hardcoded here. This limits the reusability of the component. It would be better to pass these options in as props to make the component more flexible.

{ id: 'well' }
];

export const adjacencyRules: Record<string, string[]> = {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve type safety and prevent typos, consider defining a string literal union type for the tile IDs from villageTiles. This type can then be used to strongly type adjacencyRules, ensuring that all keys and values are valid tile IDs.

For example:

export type VillageTileId =
  | 'grass'
  | 'dirt'
  | 'road_center'
  // ... etc.

export const villageTiles: { id: VillageTileId }[] = [
  // ...
];

export const adjacencyRules: Record<VillageTileId, VillageTileId[]> = {
  // ...
};

Comment on lines +67 to +130
if (tile.id.startsWith('building_roof')) {
layout.buildings.push({
id: `bldg_${x}_${y}`,
type: 'house',
polygon: [
{ x, y },
{ x: x + 1, y },
{ x: x + 1, y: y + 1 },
{ x, y: y + 1 }
],
entryPoint: { x, y: y + 1 }
});
}
if (tile.id.startsWith('road')) {
layout.roads.push({
id: `road_${x}_${y}`,
pathPoints: [{ x, y }, { x: x + 1, y }]
});
}
if (tile.id === 'farmland' && allowFarmland) {
layout.buildings.push({
id: `farm_${x}_${y}`,
type: 'farmland',
polygon: [
{ x, y },
{ x: x + 1, y },
{ x: x + 1, y: y + 1 },
{ x, y: y + 1 }
],
entryPoint: { x, y }
});
}
if (tile.id === 'market_stall' && allowMarket) {
layout.buildings.push({
id: `market_${x}_${y}`,
type: 'market',
polygon: [
{ x, y },
{ x: x + 1, y },
{ x: x + 1, y: y + 1 },
{ x, y: y + 1 }
],
entryPoint: { x, y }
});
}
if (tile.id === 'well' && allowWells) {
layout.buildings.push({
id: `well_${x}_${y}`,
type: 'well',
polygon: [
{ x, y },
{ x: x + 1, y },
{ x: x + 1, y: y + 1 },
{ x, y: y + 1 }
],
entryPoint: { x, y }
});
}
if (tile.id.startsWith('town_wall') && allowWalls) {
layout.walls.push({
id: `wall_${x}_${y}`,
pathPoints: [{ x, y }, { x: x + 1, y }]
});
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The long chain of if statements to handle different tile types can be refactored into a switch statement on tile.id. This would improve readability and make it easier to add or modify tile handling logic in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants