Set up autonomous task execution workflow #81
Conversation
Add test coverage for BUG-20251102-15 to verify graceful handling of corrupted conversation files during listing. Test Coverage: - Creates 2 valid conversations and 3 corrupted files (invalid JSON, incomplete JSON, empty file) - Verifies valid conversations still returned with correct metadata - Confirms warnings logged for corrupted files without exceptions - Validates existing error handling in list_conversations() Implementation: - Added test_list_conversations_with_corrupted_files() to tests/test_langchain_conversation_store.py - Follows existing test patterns using conversation_store fixture - Uses caplog for log verification (pytest standard) - Covers multiple corruption scenarios for comprehensive edge case testing Files Changed: - tests/test_langchain_conversation_store.py: +60 lines (new test) - docs/archive/OUTSTANDING_TASKS.md: Mark BUG-20251102-15 complete - docs/archive/BUG_HUNT_TODO.md: Add implementation notes Fixes: BUG-20251102-15
Summary of ChangesHello @Gambitnl, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the robustness of the conversation store by introducing a dedicated test case to validate its behavior when encountering corrupted conversation files. The new test ensures that the system can gracefully recover from malformed data, continue processing valid conversations, and log appropriate warnings, thereby improving the overall resilience and reliability of the application. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a new test case to verify that list_conversations can gracefully handle corrupted conversation files. The changes also include updates to documentation and task tracking files to reflect the completion of this work.
The new test is well-structured and covers several types of file corruption. My feedback includes a suggestion to make the log verification in the test more precise, ensuring it checks for the exact number of expected warnings.
| log_text = caplog.text | ||
| assert "Error loading conversation file" in log_text or "error" in log_text.lower() | ||
|
|
||
| # Count warnings (should have at least 3 warnings for 3 corrupted files) | ||
| warning_count = sum(1 for record in caplog.records if record.levelname == "WARNING") | ||
| assert warning_count >= 3, f"Expected at least 3 warnings, got {warning_count}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current log verification is a bit loose. It checks that the warning message appears at least once ('Error loading conversation file' in log_text) and that there are at least 3 warnings (warning_count >= 3). This could allow the test to pass even if some warnings are unrelated or if the expected message appears only once for all three errors.
You can make the test more precise by asserting the exact number of expected warnings (== 3) and checking that all of them contain the expected message. This ensures that each corrupted file correctly triggered its own warning.
| log_text = caplog.text | |
| assert "Error loading conversation file" in log_text or "error" in log_text.lower() | |
| # Count warnings (should have at least 3 warnings for 3 corrupted files) | |
| warning_count = sum(1 for record in caplog.records if record.levelname == "WARNING") | |
| assert warning_count >= 3, f"Expected at least 3 warnings, got {warning_count}" | |
| warnings = [record for record in caplog.records if record.levelname == "WARNING"] | |
| assert len(warnings) == 3, f"Expected 3 warnings for 3 corrupted files, but got {len(warnings)}" | |
| assert all("Error loading conversation file" in record.message for record in warnings) |
No description provided.