Skip to content

🧪 Add test for initWasm error path - #17

Open
paul0728 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
testing-improvement-initwasm-16935446410821713249
Open

🧪 Add test for initWasm error path#17
paul0728 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
testing-improvement-initwasm-16935446410821713249

Conversation

@paul0728

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🎯 What: The missing error path test for the initWasm function was addressed.
📊 Coverage: The test now covers the scenario where fetching the WASM binary fails (simulated network error), ensuring the catch block is executed and handles the error gracefully.
Result: Increased test coverage for error conditions during WASM initialization.

Includes necessary dependencies (jest, jest-environment-jsdom, jsdom) and configuration to run tests on inline scripts by extracting them into a JSDOM environment.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16935446410821713249 started by @paul0728

Add a test for initWasm network error path using jest and jsdom.
It mocks fetch to return a rejected promise to simulate an error, and
evaluates the initWasm script from index.html inside a jsdom window
to assert that the statusDiv text content is updated with the error
message.

Included jest dependencies and setup files for the environment.

Co-authored-by: paul0728 <44644609+paul0728@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant