[WIP] Fix localization bug and update script reference#590
Closed
[WIP] Fix localization bug and update script reference#590
Conversation
Contributor
🏷️ Automatic Labeling SummaryThis PR has been automatically labeled based on the files changed and PR metadata. Applied Labels: size-xs Label Categories
For more information, see |
Copilot stopped work on behalf of
pethers due to an error
February 26, 2026 16:15
Member
|
@copilot continue |
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Copilot stopped work on behalf of
pethers due to an error
February 26, 2026 17:06
Member
|
@copilot try again, investigate why all past sessions failed/halted 50+ min |
Co-authored-by: pethers <1726836+pethers@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
Author
Past sessions failed because they launched sub-agents ( In this session (commit Still remaining: translating the English body text in 11 files (ar, da, de, es, fi, fr, he, ja, ko, nl, no). The HTML structure and labels are already correctly translated in those files — only the paragraph content (~26 text blocks per language) needs replacing with a targeted Python script. |
Copilot stopped work on behalf of
pethers due to an error
February 26, 2026 18:07
github-actions
bot
added
html-css
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request aims to fix a critical localization bug and update script references in 14 opposition motions HTML files for different languages. According to the PR description, these files were copied from PR #574 but contain a critical issue where all non-English variants have English body content while only headings and metadata are translated.
Changes:
- Fix script reference from
back-to-top.tstoback-to-top.jsin all 14 language files - Translate English body content for 11 language files (ar, da, de, es, fi, fr, he, ja, ko, nl, no)
- Verify Swedish (sv) and Chinese (zh) already have proper translations
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 9 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html | Norwegian variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html | Dutch variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html | Korean variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html | Japanese variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html | French variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html | Spanish variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html | English variant - script reference fixed, serves as reference for translations |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html | German variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html | Danish variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
| news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html | Arabic (RTL) variant - script reference fixed but English body content remains |
|
|
||
| <h2>Hva skjer videre</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of Norwegian. This includes:
- The article-lede paragraph (line 206)
- The Opposition Strategy context box (lines 209-211)
- All 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs for each motion entry
- The "What Happens Next" section (line 378)
According to the PR description, this is the exact bug that needs to be fixed - all non-English variants contain English body content while only headings and metadata are translated. The same issue affects all 10 other non-English language files (ar, da, de, es, fi, fr, he, ja, ko, nl).
Suggested change
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | |
| <p>Disse 20 forslagene vil bli henvist til sine respektive komiteer (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for behandling. Komitéinnstillinger kommer normalt 4–8 uker etter henvisning, med votering i plenum kort tid etter. Konsentrasjonen av forslag om fornybardirektivet (prop. 2025/26:118) fra tre partier – S, MP og C – signaliserer at dette blir et viktig stridsspørsmål i Riksdagen våren 2026. Samtidig vil grunnlovspakken (prop. 2025/26:78) om abortrett og foreningsfrihet teste partienes vilje til bred enighet om grunnleggende rettigheter. Regjeringen står overfor en flerfrontskonflikt som vil prege lovgivningsagendaen gjennom vårsesjonen.</p> |
|
|
||
| <h2>Wat gebeurt er nu</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of Dutch. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
Suggested change
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | |
| <p>Deze 20 moties worden doorverwezen naar hun respectieve commissies (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) voor behandeling. Commissieverslagen verschijnen doorgaans 4–8 weken na doorverwijzing, waarna de plenaire stemming meestal snel volgt. De concentratie van moties over de richtlijn hernieuwbare energie (prop. 2025/26:118) van drie partijen — S, MP en C — wijst erop dat dit in het voorjaar van 2026 een belangrijk politiek strijdpunt in het parlement wordt. Tegelijkertijd zal het pakket grondwetswijzigingen (prop. 2025/26:78) over abortusrechten en de vrijheid van vereniging de partijoverschrijdende consensus over fundamentele rechten op de proef stellen. De regering staat daarmee voor een meerfrontenuitdaging die de wetgevende agenda gedurende de voorjaarszitting zal bepalen.</p> |
|
|
||
| <h2>今後の展望</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of Japanese. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
Suggested change
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | |
| <p>これら20件の動議は、それぞれ所管する委員会（産業委員会〈NU〉、財政委員会〈FiU〉、憲法委員会〈KU〉、環境・農業委員会〈MJU〉、税務委員会〈SkU〉、司法委員会〈JuU〉、社会委員会〈SoU〉など）に付託され、審議が行われる。委員会報告は通常、付託からおよそ4〜8週間後に公表され、その後ほどなくして本会議での採決が行われる。再生可能エネルギー指令（政府提案 2025/26:118）をめぐり、社会民主党（S）、環境党（MP）、中央党（C）の3党から動議が集中していることは、2026年春に向けてこれが主要な議会対立軸となることを示している。同時に、中絶の権利や結社の自由などを扱う憲法改正パッケージ（政府提案 2025/26:78）は、基本的権利をめぐる超党派の合意がどこまで維持されるかを試すものとなる。政府は、春期会期を通じて立法課題を方向づける複数の正面課題に直面することになる。</p> |
Comment on lines
+206
to
+378
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Stratégie d'opposition</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Politique énergétique et industrielle</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de l'industrie et du commerce (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finance et surveillance économique</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des finances (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Logement et droit civil</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des affaires civiles (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Environnement et climat</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de l'environnement et de l'agriculture (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Fiscalité et finances publiques</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission fiscale (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justice et sécurité</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de la justice (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Affaires sociales et santé</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des affaires sociales (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Droits constitutionnels et démocratie</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de la Constitution (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Dynamique de coalition</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 motions déposées</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Que se passe-t-il ensuite</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of French. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+378
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Estrategia de la oposición</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Política energética e industrial</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Industria y Comercio (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finanzas y supervisión económica</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Finanzas (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Vivienda y derecho civil</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Asuntos Civiles (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Medio ambiente y clima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Medio Ambiente y Agricultura (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Fiscalidad y finanzas públicas</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión Fiscal (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justicia y seguridad</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Justicia (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Asuntos sociales y salud</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Asuntos Sociales (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Derechos constitucionales y democracia</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de la Constitución (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Dinámica de coalición</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Qué sucede a continuación</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of Spanish. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
|
|
||
| <h2>Hvad sker der nu</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of Danish. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
Suggested change
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | |
| <p>Disse 20 forslag vil blive henvist til deres respektive udvalg (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) til behandling. Udvalgsbetænkninger offentliggøres typisk 4–8 uger efter henvisning, efterfulgt af afstemninger i plenarsalen kort tid efter. At tre partier — S, MP og C — har koncentreret en stor del af deres forslag om direktivet om vedvarende energi (prop. 2025/26:118) indikerer, at dette bliver et centralt stridspunkt i Riksdagen i foråret 2026. Samtidig vil pakken af grundlovsreformer (prop. 2025/26:78) om abortret og forsamlingsfrihed teste den blokoverskridende enighed om grundlæggende rettigheder. Regeringen står dermed over for en flerfrontsudfordring, der vil forme den lovgivende dagsorden gennem hele forårssamlingen.</p> |
|
|
||
| <h2>ماذا يحدث بعد ذلك</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of Arabic. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
Suggested change
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | |
| <p>سيُحال المقترحات العشرون إلى اللجان البرلمانية المختصة بها (NU وFiU وCU وMJU وSkU وJuU وSoU وKU) للمداولة. وعادةً ما تصدر تقارير اللجان خلال 4–8 أسابيع من الإحالة، تليها بفترة وجيزة عمليات التصويت في الجلسة العامة. ويشير تركّز المقترحات حول توجيه الطاقة المتجددة (prop. 2025/26:118) من ثلاثة أحزاب — الاشتراكيون الديمقراطيون (S) وحزب البيئة (MP) وحزب الوسط (C) — إلى أن هذا الملف سيصبح نقطة توتر برلمانية رئيسية في ربيع 2026. وفي الوقت نفسه، سيختبر حزمة الإصلاح الدستوري (prop. 2025/26:78) بشأن حقوق الإجهاض وحرية تكوين الجمعيات مدى قدرة الأحزاب على الحفاظ على توافق عابر للكتل حول الحقوق الأساسية. وتواجه الحكومة تحدياً متعدد الجبهات سيحدد ملامح الأجندة التشريعية خلال دورة الربيع.</p> |
|
|
||
| <h2>앞으로 무엇이 일어나나</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of Korean. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
Suggested change
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | |
| <p>이 20건의 동의안은 각각 해당 상임위원회(NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU)로 회부되어 심사를 받게 됩니다. 위원회 보고서는 통상 회부 후 4~8주 내에 나오며, 그 직후 본회의 표결이 이어집니다. 특히 재생에너지 지침(prop. 2025/26:118)에 대해 S, MP, C 세 정당이 모두 동의안을 제출했다는 점은 2026년 봄 회기에서 이 사안이 주요 의회 갈등 쟁점으로 부상할 것임을 시사합니다. 한편, 낙태권과 결사의 자유 등 기본권을 다루는 헌법 개혁 패키지(prop. 2025/26:78)는 근본적 권리에 대한 정당 간 합의를 시험대에 올릴 것입니다. 정부는 이번 봄 회기 내내 입법 의제를 규정하게 될 다중 전선의 도전에 직면해 있습니다.</p> |
Comment on lines
+206
to
+378
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Oppositionsstrategie</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Energie- und Industriepolitik</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Ausschuss für Industrie und Handel (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finanz- und Wirtschaftsaufsicht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Finanzausschuss (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Wohnen und Zivilrecht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Zivilausschuss (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Umwelt und Klima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Umwelt- und Landwirtschaftsausschuss (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Besteuerung und öffentliche Finanzen</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Steuerausschuss (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justiz und Sicherheit</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Justizausschuss (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Soziales und Gesundheit</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Sozialausschuss (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Verfassungsrechte und Demokratie</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Verfassungsausschuss (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Koalitionsdynamik</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Wie geht es weiter</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The main article body content (lines 206-378) is in English instead of German. This includes the article-lede paragraph, Opposition Strategy context box, all 20 "Why It Matters" paragraphs, and the "What Happens Next" section. This is the primary bug identified in the PR description that needs to be fixed.
Member
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Comment on lines
+369
to
+372
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 mociones presentadas</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Coalition dynamics list items still use English party names (e.g., “Social Democrats”, “Green Party”). Please localize these party labels into Spanish.
Suggested change
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 mociones presentadas</li> | |
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 mociones presentadas</li> | |
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 mociones presentadas</li> | |
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 mociones presentadas</li> | |
| <li>Socialdemócratas (S): 8 mociones presentadas</li> | |
| <li>Partido Verde (MP): 5 mociones presentadas</li> | |
| <li>Partido del Centro (C): 4 mociones presentadas</li> | |
| <li>Partido de la Izquierda (V): 3 mociones presentadas</li> |
Comment on lines
+206
to
+210
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>استراتيجية المعارضة</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The main body text is still in English in this Arabic page (article lede and the entire “استراتيجية المعارضة” context box). Please translate these paragraphs into Arabic to fully resolve the localization bug.
Suggested change
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | |
| <h2>استراتيجية المعارضة</h2> | |
| <div class="context-box"> | |
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | |
| <p class="article-lede">قدمت أحزاب المعارضة الأربعة في السويد — S وMP وC وV — عددًا إجماليًا قدره 20 مقترحًا في أحدث حزمة برلمانية، في مواجهة الحكومة عبر طيف واسع من مجالات السياسات يمتد من تحول الطاقة والتنظيم المالي إلى العدالة الجنائية والحقوق الدستورية. يتصدر الحزب الاشتراكي الديمقراطي المشهد بـ 8 مقترحات، ويساهم حزب الخضر بـ 5 مقترحات، بينما يقدم حزب الوسط 4 مقترحات، ويستكمل حزب اليسار جبهة المعارضة بـ 3 مقترحات. يعكس هذا الاتساع والحدة في المقترحات استراتيجية انتخابية مدروسة؛ فالمعارضة لا تكتفي بالطعن في مشروعات قوانين منفردة، بل تسعى إلى تشكيل السردية السياسية في كل مجال سياساتي رئيسي قبل انتخابات 2026.</p> | |
| <h2>استراتيجية المعارضة</h2> | |
| <div class="context-box"> | |
| <p>يهيمن <strong>الحزب الاشتراكي الديمقراطي (S)</strong> على عدد المقترحات بـ 8 مقترحات موزعة على ست لجان — ترخيص الطاقة المتجددة (NU)، الرقابة الاحترازية الكلية (FiU)، الاحتيال في الإسكان (CU)، إصلاح إدارة النفايات (MJU)، الضرائب الدولية (SkU)، معايير العمل في المشتريات العامة (FiU) وإصلاح نظام الوصاية (CU). يشير هذا الاتساع إلى استراتيجية معارضة منهجية شاملة تهدف إلى تحدي الحكومة في كل جبهة سياساتية رئيسية قبل انتخابات 2026. تستهدف مقترحات الحزب في مجالي الرقابة المالية ومعايير العمل القضايا المعيشية الأساسية لناخبيهم.</p><p>يقدم <strong>حزب الخضر (MP)</strong> 5 مقترحات تتركز على حماية البيئة، وتحول الطاقة، وإصلاح العدالة الجنائية والحريات المدنية — ترخيص مصادر الطاقة المتجددة، إصلاح إدارة النفايات، تنظيم جمعيات الإسكان التعاونية، متطلبات اللغة في رعاية المسنين والاحتجاز إلى أجل غير مسمى. يعكس ذلك تركيزهم المزدوج على التحول الأخضر وحقوق الإنسان، مما يضع MP في موقع صوت معارض يستند إلى البعد القيمي والضميري.</p><p>قدم <strong>حزب الوسط (C)</strong> 4 مقترحات تمتد عبر مجالات الطاقة والبيئة والعدالة والشؤون الدستورية. يميل نهجهم في قضايا ترخيص الطاقة المتجددة وإصلاح إدارة النفايات إلى إبراز الحلول القائمة على السوق وتبسيط الإجراءات الإدارية، في حين تركز مقترحاتهم بشأن الاحتجاز إلى أجل غير مسمى والإصلاح الدستوري على إبراز حقوق الفرد — وهو ما يعكس تموضع الحزب الليبرالي الوسطي.</p><p>قدم <strong>حزب اليسار (V)</strong> 3 مقترحات تتعلق بمتطلبات اللغة في رعاية المسنين، ومعايير العمل في المشتريات العامة والحقوق الدستورية. ويصر V باستمرار على تناول هذه القضايا من منظور حقوق العمال، والعدالة الاجتماعية، والمساءلة الديمقراطية — في تحدٍ لكل من سياسات الحكومة والمقاربات المدفوعة بالمنطق السوقي.</p> |
Comment on lines
+219
to
+225
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The “Por qué importa” explanation remains in English here (and appears to remain English in subsequent motion entries). Please translate the “Why It Matters” paragraph content into Spanish.
Suggested change
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | |
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> El marco de concesión de licencias de la Directiva de Energías Renovables es fundamental para la transición energética de Suecia. Tres partidos de la oposición cuestionan cómo equilibra el Gobierno el despliegue rápido de renovables con las salvaguardias medioambientales y procedimentales, reflejando una divergencia real de políticas sobre el ritmo y las condiciones de la transición verde.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Los socialdemócratas subrayan las salvaguardias regulatorias y la protección de las personas trabajadoras en la transición energética, buscando garantizar que el rápido despliegue de energías renovables no socave las normas laborales ni los procesos de evaluación ambiental.</p> |
Comment on lines
+219
to
+225
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The “Warum es wichtig ist” explanation remains in English here (and likely in the subsequent motion entries). Please translate the “Why It Matters” paragraph content into German.
Suggested change
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | |
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Der Genehmigungsrahmen der Erneuerbaren-Energien-Richtlinie ist zentral für Schwedens Energiewende. Drei Oppositionsparteien stellen infrage, wie die Regierung den schnellen Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien mit Umwelt- und Verfahrensschutz in Einklang bringt – ein Ausdruck realer politischer Differenzen über Tempo und Rahmenbedingungen des grünen Umbaus.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Die Sozialdemokraten betonen regulatorische Schutzmechanismen und Arbeitnehmerrechte in der Energiewende und wollen sicherstellen, dass der schnelle Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien weder Arbeitsstandards noch Umweltprüfungsverfahren untergräbt.</p> |
Comment on lines
+369
to
+372
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 Anträge eingereicht</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Coalition dynamics list items still use English party names (e.g., “Social Democrats”, “Green Party”). Please translate/localize these labels into German.
Suggested change
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 Anträge eingereicht</li> | |
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 Anträge eingereicht</li> | |
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 Anträge eingereicht</li> | |
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 Anträge eingereicht</li> | |
| <li>Sozialdemokraten (S): 8 Anträge eingereicht</li> | |
| <li>Grüne Partei (MP): 5 Anträge eingereicht</li> | |
| <li>Zentrumspartei (C): 4 Anträge eingereicht</li> | |
| <li>Linkspartei (V): 3 Anträge eingereicht</li> |
Comment on lines
+219
to
+231
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The “لماذا هذا مهم” explanation remains in English here (and appears to remain English for other motion entries). Please translate the “Why It Matters” paragraph content into Arabic.
Suggested change
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023912</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | |
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | |
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> يُعَدّ إطار تراخيص توجيه الطاقة المتجددة محورياً لعملية انتقال السويد في مجال الطاقة. وتتحدى ثلاثة أحزاب معارضة الطريقة التي توازن بها الحكومة بين النشر السريع لمشروعات الطاقة المتجددة وبين الضمانات البيئية والإجرائية، مما يعكس اختلافاً حقيقياً في المواقف بشأن سرعة وشروط التحول الأخضر.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> يؤكّد الحزب الاشتراكي الديمقراطي على الضمانات التنظيمية وحماية العمال في عملية الانتقال في مجال الطاقة، ساعياً إلى ضمان ألا يؤدّي التسريع في نشر مشروعات الطاقة المتجددة إلى تقويض معايير العمل أو إجراءات المراجعة البيئية.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023912</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | |
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> يتبنّى حزب الوسط مقاربة موجهة نحو السوق، إذ يدعو إلى تبسيط إجراءات منح التراخيص بما يقلّل من الحواجز البيروقراطية مع الإبقاء على معايير الاستدامة، وهو ما يعكس فلسفته الاقتصادية الليبرالية.</p> |
Comment on lines
+219
to
+225
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The “Hvorfor det er viktig” explanation remains in English here (and appears to be the case for the subsequent motion entries as well). Please translate the “Why It Matters” paragraphs so the localized page doesn’t contain English body content.
Suggested change
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | |
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Tillatelsesrammeverket i fornybardirektivet er sentralt for Sveriges energiomstilling. Tre opposisjonspartier utfordrer hvordan regjeringen balanserer rask utbygging av fornybar energi mot miljøhensyn og rettssikkerhet i saksbehandlingen, noe som synliggjør reelle politiske skillelinjer om tempoet og vilkårene for den grønne omstillingen.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Socialdemokratene legger vekt på regulatoriske sikkerhetsmekanismer og vern av arbeidstakere i energiomstillingen, og ønsker å sikre at rask utbygging av fornybar energi ikke undergraver arbeidsvilkår eller grundige miljøkonsekvensvurderinger.</p> |
Comment on lines
+219
to
+231
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">動議全文を読む： HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>提出者：</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">動議全文を読む： HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>提出者：</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The “なぜ重要か” explanation remains in English here (and likely in the other motion entries). Please translate the “Why It Matters” paragraph content into Japanese.
Suggested change
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">動議全文を読む： HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>提出者：</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">動議全文を読む： HD023912</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>提出者：</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | |
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | |
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> 再生可能エネルギー指令に基づく許認可制度は、スウェーデンのエネルギー転換の中核となる枠組みです。3つの野党は、政府が再エネ導入のスピードと、環境保護や手続き上のセーフガードとのバランスをどのように取るべきかをめぐって対立しており、グリーントランジションの「どの程度の速さで・どのような条件で」進めるかについて実質的な政策上の相違があることを示しています。</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">動議全文を読む： HD023913</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>提出者：</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | |
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> 社会民主党は、エネルギー転換を進めるにあたり、規制上のセーフガードと労働者保護を重視しています。再生可能エネルギーの急速な導入によって、労働条件や労働基準、あるいは環境影響評価などの審査プロセスが損なわれないよう確保することを狙っています。</p> | |
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">動議全文を読む： HD023912</a></p> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="motion-entry"> | |
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | |
| <p><strong>提出者：</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | |
| <p><strong>なぜ重要か：</strong> 中道党は市場志向の立場から、持続可能性基準を維持しつつ、官僚的な障壁を減らすために許認可プロセスを合理化すべきだと主張しています。これは、規制の簡素化と競争促進を重んじる同党のリベラルな経済哲学を反映したものです。</p> |
Comment on lines
+218
to
+220
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023913</a></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The “Hvorfor det er vigtigt” explanation remains in English here (and appears to remain English for other motion entries). Please translate the “Why It Matters” paragraph content into Danish.
Comment on lines
+369
to
+372
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 件の動議を提出</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 件の動議を提出</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 件の動議を提出</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 件の動議を提出</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Coalition dynamics list items still use English party names (e.g., “Social Democrats”, “Green Party”). Please localize these labels into Japanese.
Suggested change
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 件の動議を提出</li> | |
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 件の動議を提出</li> | |
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 件の動議を提出</li> | |
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 件の動議を提出</li> | |
| <li>社会民主労働党（S）：8 件の動議を提出</li> | |
| <li>緑の党（MP）：5 件の動議を提出</li> | |
| <li>中央党（C）：4 件の動議を提出</li> | |
| <li>左翼党（V）：3 件の動議を提出</li> |
Member
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Comment on lines
+206
to
+378
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Stratégie d'opposition</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Politique énergétique et industrielle</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de l'industrie et du commerce (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finance et surveillance économique</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des finances (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Logement et droit civil</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des affaires civiles (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Environnement et climat</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de l'environnement et de l'agriculture (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Fiscalité et finances publiques</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission fiscale (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justice et sécurité</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de la justice (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Affaires sociales et santé</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des affaires sociales (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Droits constitutionnels et démocratie</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de la Constitution (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Dynamique de coalition</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 motions déposées</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Que se passe-t-il ensuite</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The article body content (lines 206-378) contains untranslated English text in the French language file. All substantive content must be translated to French.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+378
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Oppositionsstrategie</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Energie- und Industriepolitik</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Ausschuss für Industrie und Handel (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finanz- und Wirtschaftsaufsicht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Finanzausschuss (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Wohnen und Zivilrecht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Zivilausschuss (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Umwelt und Klima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Umwelt- und Landwirtschaftsausschuss (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Besteuerung und öffentliche Finanzen</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Steuerausschuss (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justiz und Sicherheit</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Justizausschuss (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Soziales und Gesundheit</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Sozialausschuss (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Verfassungsrechte und Demokratie</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Verfassungsausschuss (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Koalitionsdynamik</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Wie geht es weiter</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The article body content (lines 206-378) contains untranslated English text in the German language file. All substantive content must be translated to German.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+378
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Estrategia de la oposición</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Política energética e industrial</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Industria y Comercio (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finanzas y supervisión económica</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Finanzas (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Vivienda y derecho civil</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Asuntos Civiles (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Medio ambiente y clima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Medio Ambiente y Agricultura (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Fiscalidad y finanzas públicas</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión Fiscal (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justicia y seguridad</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Justicia (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Asuntos sociales y salud</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Asuntos Sociales (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Derechos constitucionales y democracia</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de la Constitución (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Dinámica de coalición</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Qué sucede a continuación</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: The article body content (lines 206-378) contains untranslated English text in the Spanish language file. All substantive content must be translated to Spanish.
Contributor
Author
The English source strings are extracted and the branch is up to date. Session timed out before the translation script could be written and committed. The next session should write a single |
Comment on lines
+206
to
+379
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Opposisjonsstrategi</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Energi- og industripolitikk</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Næringsutvalget (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finans og økonomisk tilsyn</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Finansutvalget (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Bolig og sivilrett</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Sivilutvalget (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Miljø og klima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Miljø- og landbruksutvalget (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Beskatning og offentlige finanser</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Skatteutvalget (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Rettsvesen og sikkerhet</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Justisutvalget (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Sosiale saker og helse</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Sosialutvalget (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Grunnlovsfestede rettigheter og demokrati</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Grunnlovsutvalget (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Innlevert av:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er viktig:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Les hele forslaget: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Koalisjonsdynamikk</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 forslag innlevert</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 forslag innlevert</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 forslag innlevert</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 forslag innlevert</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Hva skjer videre</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: English content remains in non-English language files
All non-English language variants (ar, da, de, es, fi, fr, he, ja, ko, nl, no) contain substantial English body content that should be translated. This affects:
- Line 206: Opening paragraph describing 20 motions from S, MP, C, V
- Line 210: Opposition strategy context box (4 party paragraphs)
- Lines 219, 225, 231, 241, 247, 253, 263, 269, 275, 285, 291, 297, 307, 313, 323, 329, 339, 345, 355, 361: "Why It Matters" paragraphs for all 20 motion entries
- Line 378: "What Happens Next" paragraph
As noted in the PR description, these sections require full translation from the English source file to match the language indicated in the lang attribute of each HTML file. Only headings and metadata are currently translated, while substantive article content remains in English.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+379
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Stratégie d'opposition</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Politique énergétique et industrielle</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de l'industrie et du commerce (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finance et surveillance économique</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des finances (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Logement et droit civil</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des affaires civiles (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Environnement et climat</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de l'environnement et de l'agriculture (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Fiscalité et finances publiques</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission fiscale (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justice et sécurité</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de la justice (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Affaires sociales et santé</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission des affaires sociales (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Droits constitutionnels et démocratie</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commission de la Constitution (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Déposée par :</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Pourquoi c'est important :</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lire la motion complète : HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Dynamique de coalition</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 motions déposées</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 motions déposées</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Que se passe-t-il ensuite</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: English content remains in non-English language files
All non-English language variants contain substantial English body content that should be translated. The same localization issue affects lines 206-379, including the opening paragraph, opposition strategy context, all 20 "Why It Matters" sections, and the "What Happens Next" paragraph. Only headings and metadata are currently translated.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+379
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Estrategia de la oposición</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Política energética e industrial</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Industria y Comercio (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finanzas y supervisión económica</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Finanzas (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Vivienda y derecho civil</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Asuntos Civiles (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Medio ambiente y clima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Medio Ambiente y Agricultura (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Fiscalidad y finanzas públicas</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión Fiscal (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justicia y seguridad</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Justicia (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Asuntos sociales y salud</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de Asuntos Sociales (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Derechos constitucionales y democracia</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Comisión de la Constitución (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Presentada por:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Por qué importa:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leer la moción completa: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Dinámica de coalición</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 mociones presentadas</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Qué sucede a continuación</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: English content remains in non-English language files
All non-English language variants contain substantial English body content that should be translated. The same localization issue affects lines 206-379, including the opening paragraph, opposition strategy context, all 20 "Why It Matters" sections, and the "What Happens Next" paragraph. Only headings and metadata are currently translated.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+379
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Oppositionsstrategi</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Energi- og industripolitik</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Erhvervsudvalget (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finansiel og økonomisk tilsyn</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Finansudvalget (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Bolig og civilret</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Civiludvalget (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Miljø og klima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Miljø- og landbrugsudvalget (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Beskatning og offentlige finanser</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Skatteudvalget (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Retsvæsen og sikkerhed</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Retsudvalget (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Sociale anliggender og sundhed</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Socialudvalget (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Grundlovssikrede rettigheder og demokrati</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Grundlovsudvalget (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Indgivet af:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Hvorfor det er vigtigt:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Læs hele forslaget: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Koalitionsdynamik</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 forslag indgivet</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 forslag indgivet</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 forslag indgivet</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 forslag indgivet</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Hvad sker der nu</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: English content remains in non-English language files
All non-English language variants contain substantial English body content that should be translated. The same localization issue affects lines 206-379, including the opening paragraph, opposition strategy context, all 20 "Why It Matters" sections, and the "What Happens Next" paragraph. Only headings and metadata are currently translated.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+379
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Oppositiestrategie</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Energie- en industriebeleid</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commissie voor Industrie en Handel (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Financiën en economisch toezicht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Financiële commissie (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Huisvesting en civiel recht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commissie voor Civiele Zaken (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Milieu en klimaat</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Commissie voor Milieu en Landbouw (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Belasting en overheidsfinanciën</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Belastingcommissie (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justitie en veiligheid</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Justitiecommissie (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Sociale zaken en gezondheidszorg</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Sociale commissie (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Grondwettelijke rechten en democratie</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Grondwetscommissie (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Ingediend door:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Waarom het belangrijk is:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lees de volledige motie: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Coalitiedynamiek</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 moties ingediend</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 moties ingediend</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 moties ingediend</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 moties ingediend</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Wat gebeurt er nu</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: English content remains in non-English language files
All non-English language variants contain substantial English body content that should be translated. The same localization issue affects lines 206-379, including the opening paragraph, opposition strategy context, all 20 "Why It Matters" sections, and the "What Happens Next" paragraph. Only headings and metadata are currently translated.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+379
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Oppositionsstrategie</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Energie- und Industriepolitik</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Ausschuss für Industrie und Handel (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Finanz- und Wirtschaftsaufsicht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Finanzausschuss (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Wohnen und Zivilrecht</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Zivilausschuss (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Umwelt und Klima</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Umwelt- und Landwirtschaftsausschuss (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Besteuerung und öffentliche Finanzen</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Steuerausschuss (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Justiz und Sicherheit</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Justizausschuss (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Soziales und Gesundheit</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Sozialausschuss (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Verfassungsrechte und Demokratie</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>Verfassungsausschuss (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>Eingereicht von:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>Warum es wichtig ist:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>Koalitionsdynamik</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 Anträge eingereicht</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>Wie geht es weiter</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: English content remains in non-English language files
All non-English language variants contain substantial English body content that should be translated. The same localization issue affects lines 206-379, including the opening paragraph, opposition strategy context, all 20 "Why It Matters" sections, and the "What Happens Next" paragraph. Only headings and metadata are currently translated.
Comment on lines
+206
to
+379
| <p class="article-lede">Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>استراتيجية المعارضة</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>The <strong>Social Democrats (S)</strong> dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.</p><p>The <strong>Green Party (MP)</strong> contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.</p><p>The <strong>Centre Party (C)</strong> has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.</p><p>The <strong>Left Party (V)</strong> has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>سياسة الطاقة والصناعة</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>لجنة الصناعة والتجارة (NU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023913" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023913</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023912" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023912</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023908" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023908</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>الرقابة المالية والاقتصادية</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>اللجنة المالية (FiU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023911" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023911</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023898" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023898</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023896" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023896</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>الإسكان والقانون المدني</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>لجنة الشؤون المدنية (CU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023910" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023910</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023905" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023905</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023897" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023897</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>البيئة والمناخ</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>لجنة البيئة والزراعة (MJU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023909" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023909</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023907" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023907</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023906" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023906</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>الضرائب والمالية العامة</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>لجنة الضرائب (SkU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023904" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023904</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023903" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023903</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>العدالة والأمن</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>لجنة العدل (JuU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023901" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023901</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023902" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023902</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>الشؤون الاجتماعية والرعاية الصحية</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>لجنة الشؤون الاجتماعية (SoU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023899" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023899</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023900" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023900</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>الحقوق الدستورية والديمقراطية</h2> | ||
| <p class="committee-ref"><em>لجنة الدستور (KU)</em></p> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023895" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023895</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="motion-entry"> | ||
| <h3>med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap</h3> | ||
| <p><strong>مقدم من:</strong> Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)</p> | ||
| <p><strong>لماذا هذا مهم:</strong> The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.</p> | ||
| <p><a href="https://data.riksdagen.se/dokument/HD023894" class="document-link" rel="noopener noreferrer">اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023894</a></p> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| <h2>ديناميكيات الائتلاف</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li>Social Democrats (S): 8 مقترحات مقدمة</li> | ||
| <li>Green Party (MP): 5 مقترحات مقدمة</li> | ||
| <li>Centre Party (C): 4 مقترحات مقدمة</li> | ||
| <li>Left Party (V): 3 مقترحات مقدمة</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <h2>ماذا يحدث بعد ذلك</h2> | ||
| <div class="context-box"> | ||
| <p>These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.</p> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical localization bug: English content remains in non-English language files
All non-English language variants contain substantial English body content that should be translated. The same localization issue affects lines 206-379, including the opening paragraph, opposition strategy context, all 20 "Why It Matters" sections, and the "What Happens Next" paragraph. Only headings and metadata are currently translated.
Member
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Contributor
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Copilot stopped work on behalf of
pethers due to an error
February 27, 2026 11:13
Copilot stopped work on behalf of
pethers due to an error
February 27, 2026 11:43
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original prompt
Problem
The news article
news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-*.htmlpublished for 14 languages has a critical localization bug: all non-English variants (ar, da, de, es, fi, fr, he, ja, ko, nl, no, sv, zh) contain English body content while only headings and metadata are translated. This was flagged in PR review thread #574 (review).Additionally, ALL 14 language variants (including en) reference
../scripts/back-to-top.ts(TypeScript) which browsers cannot execute natively — it must be changed to../scripts/back-to-top.js.Scope of Changes Required
1. Fix script reference in ALL 14 files
In every
news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-*.htmlfile, change:to:
2. Translate full article body content
The English article (
news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html) has these sections that need full translation in each language variant:Structure to translate (lines 200-399 in each file):
<p class="article-lede">— Opening paragraph about 20 motions from S, MP, C, V<div class="context-box">— Opposition strategy analysis for each party (S, MP, C, V)<p><strong>Filed by:</strong> ...</p>label and<p><strong>Why It Matters:</strong> ...</p>explanation<p class="what-next">— Final "What Happens Next" paragraphCurrent English content that needs translation per language:
Opening lede (article-lede):
"Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election."
Opposition Strategy context box (4 party paragraphs):
For each motion entry — "Why It Matters" and "Filed by" label (20 entries):
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.