-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
More configurer validation changes, should fill in missing defaults into config #147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mracine
wants to merge
1
commit into
Halibot:configurer-overhaul
Choose a base branch
from
mracine:configurer-superhaul
base: configurer-overhaul
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ | |
| from .halmodule import HalModule | ||
| from .halagent import HalAgent | ||
| from .halauth import HalAuth | ||
| from .halconfigurer import HalConfigurer | ||
|
|
||
| # Avoid appending "." if it i | ||
| if "." not in sys.path: | ||
|
|
@@ -120,7 +121,11 @@ def load_object(self, pkg, conf={}): | |
| if len(split) == 2: | ||
| obj = self._get_class_from_package(*split) | ||
| if obj and self._check_version(obj): | ||
| return obj(self, conf=conf) | ||
| # Check config and any missing values | ||
| cfgr = obj.Configurer() | ||
| conf = cfgr.validate_config(conf) | ||
| conf['of'] = pkg | ||
| return obj(self, conf=conf) | ||
| else: | ||
| self.log.error("Invalid class identifier {}, must contain only 1 ':'".format(conf["of"])) | ||
| return None | ||
|
|
@@ -132,6 +137,10 @@ def _instantiate_objects(self, key): | |
| conf = inst[k] | ||
| obj = self.load_object(conf["of"], conf=conf) | ||
|
|
||
| if obj.config != conf: | ||
| self.config[key + "-instances"][k] = obj.config | ||
| self.config._write_config() | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not sure that I am a fan of this, maybe we should just give a warning instead? I can be convinced otherwise though. If I am convinced otherwise, we probably should set a bool and do the write after the loop though. |
||
|
|
||
| if obj: | ||
| self.add_instance(k, obj) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't this be a
continueinstead? if we break we don't validate the rest of the keys