Open
Conversation
Member
|
Logic hasn't been implemented correctly. Kindly fix it |
Author
@ZiyanK Where did you find any logical error? |
Author
|
Some of the super-Poulet numbers are
For example, 341 is a super-Poulet number: it has positive divisors I have checked all these numbers and it passes every one of them, kindly go through the code once again to understand it or run it once. Also refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-Poulet_number |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


The idea is to generate all the divisors of the number
Nand for all divisor checkDdivides2^D-2.If this condition satisfy for all divisors then the number is
super-pouletnumber.