fix: accept exact loader bar schemas for feature inputs - #51
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
market-bars/1base and derived Parquet schemas as feature inputsOperational evidence
The development catalog has 96 AVAILABLE loader manifests and 768 receipts using
market-bars/1. Live samples confirmed 30m uses the base schema while 1h/4h/1d use the derived schema withsource_bar_countandsource_minutes.Validation
109 passed, 2 deselectedacross feature backfill/output trust-boundary testsruff checkpassedmypy apps/pipeline_worker/feature_output.pypassedThe deselected tests are Docker-backed integration tests; the local root backend pointer currently lags the vendored central-migration fixture (§2.7), which is unrelated to this patch.