fix: verify adjusted loader bar metadata - #54
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
adjustment=allParquet metadata for adjusted feature inputsALPACA_SIP_ALL_<resolution>feedsadjustment=rawis rejectedOperational evidence
After PR #53 allowed exact version verification, the four-resolution canary advanced to Parquet validation and rejected all four sources. The staged backfill planner intentionally selects
ALPACA_SIP_ALL_<resolution>feeds, while the reader incorrectly requiredadjustment=raw.TDD / validation
adjustment=all56 passed, 1 deselectedfor the feature-output trust-boundary suiteSafety
This does not broaden the accepted metadata set: it replaces the wrong raw adjustment with the one production feed identity the backfill planner selects.