Skip to content

Align Entire preflight with supported checkpoint remote#26

Merged
hudsonaikins merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/intb-260-entire-release-preflight
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

Align Entire preflight with supported checkpoint remote#26
hudsonaikins merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/intb-260-entire-release-preflight

Conversation

@hudsonaikins

@hudsonaikins hudsonaikins commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • replace the unsupported Entire settings shape with the documented GitHub checkpoint remote
  • require the project and effective Entire checkpoint remotes to match the private Tabellio control repository
  • require committed project and effective automatic session pushing to remain disabled
  • keep metadata-branch health verification read-only
  • update focused tests and operator documentation

Root cause

Tabellio configured and enforced an unsupported checkpoints.primary shape. Entire CLI 0.7.7 rejected that field and reported the repository disabled, blocking agent and release preflight despite healthy checkpoint metadata.

Exact-head evidence

  • candidate: f8c83777724a6e810aa2515810714cbfcff12d25
  • Entire checkpoint: c55fc3895b17
  • Tabellio validation: validation-9501dfb1-fae8-4745-bee9-88a729d58be1, 5/5 required validators passed, 115/115 tests, complete $0 cost telemetry
  • Fallow new-only gate: passed; zero introduced dead code, complexity, or duplication
  • focused preflight tests: 15/15 passed
  • agent preflight: 11/11 required checks passed on exact candidate
  • release preflight: all operational checks passed; expected clean-main blocker remains until merge
  • hosted checks: Tests, Fallow changed-code, Package dry-run, and product validate passed on exact candidate
  • Codex terminal re-review: no major issues on exact candidate
  • evidence envelope: generated and validated; 5 changed files; external-action policy passed; no external actions attempted

Review repair

Codex exact-head review found one P2: project push_sessions: true could be masked by local false. Head f8c8377 now rejects project-level enablement independently and adds the masking regression case.

Commands

  • npm run check
  • node --test tests/preflight.test.mjs
  • fallow audit --base origin/main --gate new-only --format json --quiet --explain
  • node scripts/tabellio-validate.mjs gate --repo . --repo-id IntelIP/Tabellio --base origin/main --commit HEAD --manifest tabellio.validation.json --runner-id codex-entire-preflight-review-fix
  • node scripts/tabellio-preflight.mjs --profile agent
  • node scripts/tabellio-preflight.mjs --profile release
  • npm pack --dry-run --json

External-action policy

No deploy, release, tag, npm publication, infrastructure, DNS, billing, live-money, production-data, or destructive workspace action performed. Merge remains separately approval-gated.

Review notes

Control-repository routing is security-sensitive. Please verify fail-closed handling for missing, malformed, locally overridden, mismatched, and auto-pushing Entire settings.

Official contract references: https://docs.entire.io/cli/configuration and https://github.com/entireio/cli.

@hudsonaikins
hudsonaikins marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2026 20:52
@hudsonaikins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review using gpt-5.5. Review exact head 2248c0e. Focus on fail-closed Entire checkpoint transport, local overrides, automatic push disablement, and non-mutating metadata health verification.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2248c0e29c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread scripts/lib/preflight.mjs

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2248c0e29c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread scripts/lib/preflight.mjs
Entire-Checkpoint: c55fc3895b17
@hudsonaikins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review using gpt-5.5. Re-review exact head f8c8377 after fixing the project push_sessions masking P2. Verify the committed project setting cannot be masked by local settings and check for regressions.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: f8c8377772

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@hudsonaikins
hudsonaikins merged commit f6b3354 into main Jul 22, 2026
4 checks passed
@hudsonaikins
hudsonaikins deleted the codex/intb-260-entire-release-preflight branch July 22, 2026 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant