Skip to content

fix(review): correct stale 'gittensory' brand reference in a comment #9205

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
JSONbored merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2026
+1 −1
Merged

fix(review): correct stale 'gittensory' brand reference in a comment #9205

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/review/predicted-gate-agreement.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// Predicted-vs-live gate agreement (#predicted-live-gate-agreement, maintainer review-stack x AMS integration
// audit 2026-07-09) -- a SIBLING to computeGateEval/computeGateParity (src/review/parity.ts), answering a
// DIFFERENT question than either: not "does gittensory match reviewbot" (computeGateParity) and not "does one
// DIFFERENT question than either: not "does loopover match reviewbot" (computeGateParity) and not "does one
// system's prediction match the human's realized merge/close" (computeGateEval), but "does the MCP predict_gate
// tool's pre-submission verdict for a contributor match the REAL gate decision their eventual PR receives."
//
Expand Down
Loading